Information Security News mailing list archives
Re: true terror...
From: InfoSec News <isn () c4i org>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 03:19:29 -0600 (CST)
Forwarded from: Richard Forno <rforno () infowarrior org> There are two reasons for them to keep issuing these warnings. Conspiracy Theory: The reason why we keep seeing these "credible warnings" is simple. By issuing a warning, even one as nebulous as what we've seen recently, the FBI - the agency in charge of counterterrorism - can have plausibile deniability in the event something occurs. Eg, Week 2: "We have credible evidence...' (Nothing happens) Week 3: Bad press aimed at FBI for panicking folks Week 4: "we have credible evidence...' (Nothing happnes) Week 5: More bad press aimed at FBI for panicking folks ... Week 24: "We have credible evidence...." (SOMETHING HAPPENS) Week 25: Press goes ga-ga and sings the FBI's praises for alertness; Emperor Ashcroft lobbies for and receives more funding for FY03. Now they can honestly say they provided public warning, and as a result, are cleared of any 'witholding information' that cost American lives. Hopefully-The-Real-Reason Theory: Of course, the rationalist in me sees this as a catch-22 for the FBI. If they DON'T issue an alert, and something happens, they're bitched at for witholding information and being incompetent. If they DO issue an alert, and nothing happens, they're bitched at for undue panic and fear-mongering. A frustrating situation, to be sure. I hope this is the real reason for them doing this. My 2 cents. rf - ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org To unsubscribe email majordomo () attrition org with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY of the mail.
Current thread:
- true terror... InfoSec News (Nov 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: true terror... InfoSec News (Nov 07)
- Re: true terror... InfoSec News (Nov 07)
- RE: true terror... InfoSec News (Nov 08)