Information Security News mailing list archives
At Forbes, Sore Over Sources
From: InfoSec News <isn () C4I ORG>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:18:44 -0500
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54672-2000Jul16.html By Howard Kurtz Washington Post Staff Writer Monday , July 17, 2000; C01 Reporter Adam Penenberg is quitting Forbes magazine to protect Slut Puppy and Master Pimp. An expert on the shadowy underworld of computer hackers, Penenberg says he's leaving his job because Forbes won't support his refusal to testify before a federal grand jury. Prosecutors want to talk to him about his 1998 article on the aforementioned cyberspace duo who hacked into the New York Times Web site and shut it down for nine hours. "It would ruin my career, and it's wrong," Penenberg says. "I write these inside-hacker stories and I break a lot of news, and I couldn't do that if it were viewed that I was helping out the Department of Justice in an investigation. I feel like my publisher is stabbing me in the back." The dispute, however, is more complicated than that. Forbes's attorney says he's made an arrangement with prosecutors in which Penenberg would be asked only to attest that his article is accurate--not about his confidential sources. Penenberg is not only balking at the deal, he's hired his own lawyer--the son of Chief Justice William Rehnquist--and is asking the magazine to pick up the tab. "Surely, Forbes cannot be expected to underwrite the legal fees of separate counsel for an employee that Forbes has agreed to represent without charge," attorney Tennyson Schad wrote Rehnquist. "Not only is it wasteful, it raises the possibility that the employee's counsel would pursue a strategy different from Forbes', and at Forbes' expense." Criticizing Penenberg's "inflexibility" in refusing to accept the "pre-arranged compromise" with the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office, Schad says the reporter "fails to see that the hackers, in seeking publicity in Forbes, recklessly placed themselves in the DOJ headlights, yet Adam is willing to fall on his sword and risk contempt by not at least admitting that the article was true and accurate." What's more, Schad writes, Forbes hasn't decided "just how far it is willing to go to fight any government subpoena." In the richly detailed piece, Penenberg described how the hackers, operating out of Slut Puppy's three-room condo, replaced the Times welcome screen with one tinged with nudity and obscenity, in part to protest a book about another hacker co-authored by Times reporter John Markoff. Penenberg says the Forbes lawyer is "trying to coerce me into testifying," and that he doesn't trust the prosecutors not to ask broader questions. Schad dismisses as "nonsense" the notion that the reporter is being pushed to testify. While declining to comment on the details of the dispute, he says it's "premature" to talk about the situation with the U.S. attorney's office but that "we're not going to abandon Adam." Penenberg, though, is abandoning Forbes. "It seems to me a very rich company like Forbes would stay firm on this," he says. ISN is hosted by SecurityFocus.com --- To unsubscribe email LISTSERV () SecurityFocus com with a message body of "SIGNOFF ISN".
Current thread:
- At Forbes, Sore Over Sources InfoSec News (Jul 17)