Interesting People mailing list archives

re The Trump administration is suing California to quash its new net neutrality law


From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 07:30:05 +0900




Begin forwarded message:

From: "Bill D. Herman" <billdherman () gmail com>
Date: October 2, 2018 at 6:47:31 AM GMT+9
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: Re: [IP] re The Trump administration is suing California to quash its new net neutrality law

This is a feature of news coverage and public framing of net neutrality overall and of information policy debates 
more broadly.

Scrappy NGOs like EFF and Public Knowledge punch well above their weight, get stuff done or prevent foreseeable train 
wrecks, and everyone credits Google and other commercial behemoths for the outcome. The most glaring example was the 
SOPA blackout. News coverage treated Wikipedia like a monolith; lumped it in with Google, Amazon, & co.; and pretty 
much never mentioned Fight for the Future & Demand Progress. (There are other corners of the info policy ecosystem 
that also don't get the credit they deserve. If it were up to me, Mike Masnick would've gotten at least one Pulitzer 
by now.)

But what do I know? It's not like I wrote a book about this stuff...


On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 8:48 PM DAVID FARBER <dfarber () me com> wrote:



Begin forwarded message:

From: Richard Bennett <richard () bennett com>
Date: October 1, 2018 at 11:44:25 AM GMT+9
To: ip <ip () listbox com>
Cc: Dave Farber <farber () gmail com>
Subject: The Trump administration is suing California to quash its new net neutrality law

[Dave: for IP]

The lawsuit over California’s net neutrality law is going to be interesting, pitting California’s Internet 
monopolies against the companies that connect our homes and offices to them. Oddly, the primary lobbyist that 
worked tirelessly to pass this law - EFF - doesn’t get any credit in the stories about the pending lawsuit. 


RB
"...But the FCC's efforts immediately put Washington on a collision course with the states. To start, more than 20 
states filed lawsuits against the FCC, arguing that the agency had acted arbitrarily in repealing the net 
neutrality rules. Their efforts have won the support of companies like Mozilla and trade associations representing 
tech giants including Amazon, Facebook and Google, along with consumer groups like Free Press and Public Knowledge.

"Many governors and legislatures also set about trying to craft policies preserving net neutrality within their 
borders, even though the FCC’s repeal order explicitly prohibited states from writing their own open-internet laws. 
That prompted the DOJ to file its lawsuit in a federal court in Sacramento, which seeks a preliminary injunction 
that will stop California’s net neutrality rules from taking effect on January 1.

"“Not only is California’s Internet regulation law illegal, it also hurts consumers," Pai said in a statement. “The 
law prohibits many free-data plans, which allow consumers to stream video, music, and the like exempt  from any 
data limits. They have proven enormously popular in the marketplace, especially among lower-income Americans. But 
notwithstanding the consumer benefits, this state law bans them.”"


https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/10/01/trump-administration-is-suing-california-quash-its-new-net-neutrality-law/?utm_term=.79fc3174654e

—
Richard Bennett
High Tech Forum Founder
Ethernet & Wi-Fi standards co-creator

Internet Policy Consultant

Archives | Modify Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now         



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-a538de84&post_id=20181001183016:8FEFD392-C5C9-11E8-A946-9B1647195084
Powered by Listbox: https://www.listbox.com

Current thread: