Interesting People mailing list archives
re The Trump administration is suing California to quash its new net neutrality law
From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 07:30:05 +0900
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Bill D. Herman" <billdherman () gmail com> Date: October 2, 2018 at 6:47:31 AM GMT+9 To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: Re: [IP] re The Trump administration is suing California to quash its new net neutrality law This is a feature of news coverage and public framing of net neutrality overall and of information policy debates more broadly. Scrappy NGOs like EFF and Public Knowledge punch well above their weight, get stuff done or prevent foreseeable train wrecks, and everyone credits Google and other commercial behemoths for the outcome. The most glaring example was the SOPA blackout. News coverage treated Wikipedia like a monolith; lumped it in with Google, Amazon, & co.; and pretty much never mentioned Fight for the Future & Demand Progress. (There are other corners of the info policy ecosystem that also don't get the credit they deserve. If it were up to me, Mike Masnick would've gotten at least one Pulitzer by now.) But what do I know? It's not like I wrote a book about this stuff...On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 8:48 PM DAVID FARBER <dfarber () me com> wrote: Begin forwarded message:From: Richard Bennett <richard () bennett com> Date: October 1, 2018 at 11:44:25 AM GMT+9 To: ip <ip () listbox com> Cc: Dave Farber <farber () gmail com> Subject: The Trump administration is suing California to quash its new net neutrality law [Dave: for IP] The lawsuit over California’s net neutrality law is going to be interesting, pitting California’s Internet monopolies against the companies that connect our homes and offices to them. Oddly, the primary lobbyist that worked tirelessly to pass this law - EFF - doesn’t get any credit in the stories about the pending lawsuit. RB "...But the FCC's efforts immediately put Washington on a collision course with the states. To start, more than 20 states filed lawsuits against the FCC, arguing that the agency had acted arbitrarily in repealing the net neutrality rules. Their efforts have won the support of companies like Mozilla and trade associations representing tech giants including Amazon, Facebook and Google, along with consumer groups like Free Press and Public Knowledge. "Many governors and legislatures also set about trying to craft policies preserving net neutrality within their borders, even though the FCC’s repeal order explicitly prohibited states from writing their own open-internet laws. That prompted the DOJ to file its lawsuit in a federal court in Sacramento, which seeks a preliminary injunction that will stop California’s net neutrality rules from taking effect on January 1. "“Not only is California’s Internet regulation law illegal, it also hurts consumers," Pai said in a statement. “The law prohibits many free-data plans, which allow consumers to stream video, music, and the like exempt from any data limits. They have proven enormously popular in the marketplace, especially among lower-income Americans. But notwithstanding the consumer benefits, this state law bans them.”" https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/10/01/trump-administration-is-suing-california-quash-its-new-net-neutrality-law/?utm_term=.79fc3174654e — Richard Bennett High Tech Forum Founder Ethernet & Wi-Fi standards co-creator Internet Policy ConsultantArchives | Modify Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now
------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915 Unsubscribe Now: https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-a538de84&post_id=20181001183016:8FEFD392-C5C9-11E8-A946-9B1647195084 Powered by Listbox: https://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- re The Trump administration is suing California to quash its new net neutrality law Dave Farber (Oct 01)