Interesting People mailing list archives

The Man Who Saw the Dangers of Cambridge Analytica Years Ago


From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:15:38 +0900




Begin forwarded message:

From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com>
Date: June 20, 2018 at 2:35:55 PM GMT+9
To: Multiple recipients of Dewayne-Net <dewayne-net () warpspeed com>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] The Man Who Saw the Dangers of Cambridge Analytica Years Ago
Reply-To: dewayne-net () warpspeed com

The Man Who Saw the Dangers of Cambridge Analytica Years Ago
By Issie Lapowski
Jun 19 2018
<https://www.wired.com/story/the-man-who-saw-the-dangers-of-cambridge-analytica/>

In December 2014, John Rust wrote to the head of the legal department at the University of Cambridge, where he is a 
professor, warning them that a storm was brewing.

According to an email reviewed by WIRED, Rust informed the university that one of the school’s psychology professors, 
Aleksandr Kogan, was using an app he created to collect data on millions of Facebook users without their knowledge. 
Not only did the app collect data on people who opted into it, it also collected data on those users’ Facebook 
friends. He wrote that if just 100,000 people opted into the app, and if they had an average of 150 friends each, 
Kogan would have access to 15 million people’s data, which he could then use for the purposes of political 
persuasion. Journalists had already begun poking around, and Rust wanted the school to intervene, arguing Kogan’s 
work put the university at risk of “considerable media attention, almost entirely adverse.”

“Their intention is to extend this to the entire US population and use it within an election campaign,” Rust wrote of 
Kogan and his client, a little-known political consulting firm that went on to be called Cambridge Analytica. He 
predicted, “I simply can’t see this one going away.”

Six months later, Donald Trump announced his candidacy for President of the United States, and launched a campaign 
that depended, in part, on Cambridge Analytica's work. His shocking election victory in 2016 thrust the firm into the 
spotlight, earning the company contracts with major commercial clients around the world. But more than a year after 
it helped get Trump in the White House, news broke that Cambridge Analytica had hired Kogan to harvest the data of 
tens of millions of American Facebook users without their consent, stoking international outrage from those who felt 
their privacy had been violated.

As director of the university’s Psychometrics Centre, which researches and develops psychological tests, Rust knew 
better than most how Facebook data can be manipulated. It was researchers in his own lab who first discovered that 
Facebook likes could be used to deduce all sorts of sensitive information about people’s personalities and political 
persuasions. But he says the goal of that research—and the goal of his 40 years in the field—was to warn the world 
about what can be done with this data and the dangers of allowing it to be so freely traded.

Years later, Rust takes no joy in being proven right. “We could see even four years ago the potential damage it would 
do, and there was nothing we seemed to be able to do to stop it,” he says today.

Facebook now acknowledges that Kogan collected the Facebook data of up to 87 million Americans and sold it to 
Cambridge Analytica. But as CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his team attempt to clean up the mess, Rust is hardly being 
hailed as some digital Paul Revere. Instead, his entire department and indeed his entire legacy have been swept up 
with both Kogan and Cambridge Analytica, accused by Zuckerberg himself of committing the very violations that Rust 
tried to warn against.  “Our number one goal is to protect people’s data first and foremost,” says Ime Archibong, 
Facebook’s director of product partnerships. “We have an opportunity to do better.”

Since this spring, when news of the scandal broke, Facebook has cut off several apps used in the Psychometrics 
Centre's work, and in his testimony before Congress earlier this year, Zuckerberg suggested that “something bad” 
might be going on within the department that required further investigation from Facebook. In written responses 
submitted to Congress last week, Facebook mentions the Psychometrics Centre 16 times, always in conjunction with 
Kogan, who briefly collaborated with the researchers there.

Now Rust and others await the results of Facebook’s investigation, which is itself on hold until UK regulators finish 
their own probe. And yet the Centre’s reputation already seems inextricably bound to the fallout of the Cambridge 
Analytica scandal. Rust fears the condemnations from Facebook have not only tainted the legacy of the department, 
they’ve brought a key area of research to a halt at a time when Rust insists it’s needed most.

[snip]

Dewayne-Net RSS Feed: http://dewaynenet.wordpress.com/feed/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/wa8dzp





-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-a538de84&post_id=20180620041549:225EE2FE-7462-11E8-9D53-C7F7A35ACEB0
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: