Interesting People mailing list archives

D.C. Court of Appeals: tracking phones without a warrant is unconstitutional


From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:22:55 -0400




Begin forwarded message:

From: Richard Forno <rforno () infowarrior org>
Date: September 21, 2017 at 6:00:48 PM EDT
To: Infowarrior List <infowarrior () attrition org>
Cc: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: D.C. Court of Appeals: tracking phones without a warrant is unconstitutional

D.C. court rules tracking phones without a warrant is unconstitutional

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-court-rules-warrant-is-required-for-stingray-cell-phone-tracking/

Law enforcement use of one tracking tool, the cell-site simulator, to track a suspect's phone without a warrant 
violates the Constitution, the D.C. Court of Appeals said Thursday in a landmark ruling for privacy and Fourth 
Amendment rights as they pertain to policing tactics.

The ruling could have broad implications for law enforcement's use of cell-site simulators, which local police and 
federal agencies can use to mimic a cell phone tower to the phone connect to the device instead of its regular 
network. 

In a decision that reversed the decision of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and overturned the 
conviction of a robbery and sexual assault suspect, the D.C. Court of Appeals determined the use of the cell-site 
simulator "to locate a person through his or her cellphone invades the person's actual, legitimate and reasonable 
expectation of privacy in his or her location information and is a search." 

The Fourth Amendment guarantees, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, 
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable 
cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or 
things to be seized."


Play Video
Secret tracking of cellphones

D.C. Metropolitan Police's use of such cell-site simulator technology to nab suspect Prince Jones in 2013 "violated 
the Fourth Amendment," the court decided against the U.S. government on Thursday. 

"We thus conclude that under ordinary circumstances, the use of a cell-site simulator to locate a person through his 
or her cellphone invades the person's actual, legitimate and reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her location 
information and is a search," the court ruling said. "The government's argument to the contrary is unpersuasive."

A December 2016 report from the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee found U.S. taxpayers spent $95 
million on 434 cell-site simulator devices between 2010 and 2014, with the price tag for a single device hovering 
around $500,000.

"While law enforcement agencies should be able to utilize technology as a tool to help officers be safe and 
accomplish their missions, absent proper oversight and safeguards, the domestic use of cell-site simulators may well 
infringe upon the constitutional rights of citizens to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, as well as 
the right to free association," the report said.

Under former Attorney General Eric Holder — under some pressure from Congress — the Department of Justice in 2015 
issued a policy that federal authorities could only use cell-site simulators with a warrant. But that policy was 
never inked into law, and policies can change. Attorney General Jeff Sessions' tough-on-crime stance has worried some 
privacy advocates as to how he might use tools like cell-site simulators. 

© 2017 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20170921182305:6E1F96F6-9F1B-11E7-AA9B-B9F8EC3FC895
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: