Interesting People mailing list archives

The death of the startup: is big tech squeezing out the competition? | Technology | The Guardian


From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:30:48 -0400




Begin forwarded message:

From: Allan Davidson <alland () heckerty com>
Date: October 20, 2017 at 8:19:53 AM EDT
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: The death of the startup: is big tech squeezing out the competition? | Technology | The Guardian

Hi Dave

Thought this might interest readers of your list:



https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/20/tech-startups-facebook-amazon-google-apple?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+USA+-+Collections+2017&utm_term=248826&subid=11251563&CMP=GT_US_collection

The death of the startup: is big tech squeezing out the competition?
Friday 20 October 2017
 
The leading tech companies are making it harder for startups to attract investment. Photograph: Alvarez/Getty Images
Facebook has been breathing down the neck of the group video-chat app Houseparty for over a year. The app, developed 
by the San Francisco startup Life On Air, has been a hit with teenagers – an audience Facebook is desperate to woo.

After months of sniffing around its tiny competitor and even inviting the team to its headquarters last summer, 
Facebook launched its own group video chat tool within Messenger in December 2016. In February, it invited teens to 
its headquarters to quiz them, in return for $275 Amazon cards, on how and why they used video-chat apps. By July, 
Facebook was demonstrating a Houseparty clone, Bonfire, to employees and by early September the app launched in 
Denmark.

“They see we’re having traction,” Sima Sistani, co-founder of Houseparty, told the Wall Street Journal in August. 
“That’s why we’re pushing so hard.”

Pushing hard might not be enough when you’re going up against some of the world’s most powerful companies keen to 
cling to their empires.

Startups drive job creation and innovation, but the number of new business launches is at a 30-year low and some 
economists, investors and entrepreneurs are pointing their fingers at big tech.

For one thing, the deep pockets and resources of companies like Facebook, Google, Amazon and Apple – with a combined 
value of almost $2.5tn – make it increasingly difficult for startups to compete or attract investment.

“People are not getting funded because Amazon might one day compete with them,” said one founder, who wished to 
remain anonymous. “If it was startup versus startup, it would have been a fair fight, but startup versus Amazon and 
it’s game over.”

Even multibillion-dollar startups like Snap, Snapchat’s parent company, struggle to compete against these tech 
titans.

Like Houseparty, Snap was nipping at the heels of Facebook. At first, Facebook played nicely, making an offer to buy 
Snapchat – a strategy that worked with Instagram and WhatsApp. When that failed, Facebook cloned all of Snapchat’s 
features, awkwardly at first but relentlessly and with the resources of a $510bn company, until Snap’s potential 
slice of the advertising market shriveled to a sliver.

While there’s a clear correlation, it’s hard to say for sure whether concentration of money is the cause or effect 
of the startup decline. On one hand, the existence of fewer new startups makes it easier for incumbent firms to 
accumulate more power. However, as industries become more concentrated, it also raises the barriers to new 
entrepreneurship, choking off innovation elsewhere in the marketplace.

“They are financing the next generation research at a scale that no one else can afford,” said Tomasz Tunguz, a 
venture capitalist, citing Google’s experimental projects Loon (balloon-powered internet), Fiber (high-speed 
internet) and Waymo (self-driving cars). “They are playing in big markets, making big bets. Historically, that’s 
been the domain of startups.”

As those companies get more powerful and staff salaries get higher, there’s even less of an incentive for workers to 
leave and set up on their own, which used to be a common pathway for entrepreneurs. If they do leave, the endgame is 
often to be acquired by their previous employer rather than grow large enough to compete with it.

“If your strategy from the outset is to be acquired by Google, that’s just fueling consolidation,” said Ian 
Hathaway, an economist at the Brookings Institution.

Jonathan Frankel was thrilled when Amazon’s investment arm funneled $5.6m into his startup Nucleus after a year of 
discussions. He was less thrilled when, a year later, Amazon launched its latest voice-controlled device, the Echo 
Show: an almost perfect clone of the Nucleus product.


Nucleus was an Alexa-powered tablet computer that focused on video conferencing and communication, with a plan – 
that Amazon’s investment arm would have seen – to move into other areas. When the Echo Show launched, it too focused 
on communication, the core of Nucleus’s vision, instead of other key features like e-commerce or connected home 
elements.

Frankel, who declined to comment for this piece, was furious, telling Recode earlier this year: “Their thesis is 
what our thesis was: communication is that Trojan horse to get those devices throughout the home and throughout the 
extended family’s home.

“The difference is, they want to sell more detergent; we actually want to help families communicate easier.”

These kinds of tactics have rattled investors, some founders said, making it harder for startups to raise money even 
if they’re in an adjacent market – particularly those skirting Amazon and Facebook.

A venture capitalist confirms this, describing Amazon’s launch of an almost identical product as a “very, very 
strange coincidence”.

“At the end of the day, Amazon could be theoretically in nearly any consumer business in the world,” he said, adding 
that he was frequently in meetings where investment decisions are informed by the question: “Can Amazon do that?”

“Amazon can do anything,” he noted.

It’s not just a problem within the tech industry. Since 1980, the share of companies less than a year old has almost 
halved – from 15% of companies to just 8.1%, according to Census Bureau data. The total number of startups formed in 
2015 (the last year surveyed) was 414,000 – a huge drop from the pre-recession figure of 558,000 in 2006.

“It’s been a persistent and fairly precipitous decline,” said John Dearie, the founder of the Center for American 
Entrepreneurship, an organization set up to address the decline. “The reason why this is so troubling is that new 
businesses account for virtually all new job creation and account disproportionately for disruptive innovations.”

“It’s not a coincidence that at a time when the startup rate is in a long-term decline, the economy has not grown at 
3% or better,” said Dearie. “We are in a growth emergency.”



‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌


‌‌

                                                              ______________________

Allan Davidson                                                                tel:                    +1 480 234-5978
heckerty.com — fun videos, great stories, smiling kids                        email:          alland () heckerty com
The Heckerty Company, Inc.                                                            chat:           Chat Center‌
                                                                                                              ‌
‌‌                    
‌SUBSCRIBE NOW!‌              ‌       

HECKERTY’S LATEST FABULOUS ADVENTURES!







-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20171020093059:E6CAA006-B59A-11E7-9568-CE006D748174
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: