Interesting People mailing list archives
re Tell Congress to Protect Our Online Privacy Rights | EFF Action Center
From: "David Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 05:35:27 -0500
Just for info, I am on the Board of the “lobbying group" (which it is not) but in my interest in presenting all sides I post this. Dave Begin forwarded message: From: Brett Glass <brett () lariat net> Subject: Re: [IP] Tell Congress to Protect Our Online Privacy Rights | EFF Action Center Date: February 25, 2017 at 7:18:48 PM EST To: dave () farber net Dave, and everyone: Unfortunately, this lobbying group's "call to action" misrepresents the facts. The fact is that the FCC, by illegally reclassifying Internet access as falling under Title II of the Communications Act, stripped the FTC -- the nation's privacy watchdog -- of the power to regulate the privacy practices of broadband providers. It then imposed onerous restrictions upon ISPs, who do not spy on users, while leaving the REAL spies -- Google/Doubleclick and other edge providers -- completely unfettered. How onerous were these restrictions? The Report and Order (see link below) was 219 pages of dense legalese, and announced that additional "guidance" documents would be released later to instruct ISPs as to how the FCC would choose to interpret and enforce it. Small providers like myself, concerned that they would be crushed under the burdens of compliance, immediately petitioned for an exemption but were rebuffed by the Wheeler FCC, which consistently sought to hobble ISPs while tilting the playing field toward edge providers. The Pai FCC's actions this week are the first step toward undoing the mess which the Wheeler FCC created. (Ultimately, the illegal Title II reclassification must be repealed, either by the Commission or by the courts, because Internet access is explicitly classified as falling under Title I at 47 USC 230(f).) Once the process is complete, there will be uniform privacy protections covering both edge providers AND ISPs. For more on this, see then-Commissioner Ajit Pai's dissent regarding the so-called "privacy" regulations at P. 209 of the voluminous Order, which is available at https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-148A1.pdf --Brett Glass At 04:56 AM 2/25/2017, you wrote:
https://act.eff.org/action/tell-congress-to-protect-our-online-privacy-rights Records of your online activity reveal a tremendous amount about you. While that kind of data is currently protected by federal rules, some members of Congress are trying to repeal those rules so your broadband provider can sell your sensitive Internet activity records to the highest bidder.
------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125 Unsubscribe Now: https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20170226053537:4CF09C0A-FC0F-11E6-ABB9-C29FBCDDB970 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- re Tell Congress to Protect Our Online Privacy Rights | EFF Action Center David Farber (Feb 26)