Re Do Women Want to be Oppressed?

["Dave Farber" <dave () farber net>]

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ellen Ullman <ullman () well com>
Date: Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [IP] Do Women Want to be Oppressed?
To: dave <dave () farber net>


Dave,


I don't want to push back but enlarge this conversation.



On that peacock's tail: See Richard O. Prum's *The Evolution of Beauty: How
Darwin's Forgotten Theory of Mate Choice Shapes the Animal World -- and Us*.
Among other questions, he asks why females choose males with those
magnificent tales, choose male birds who can construct colorful bowers --
not just any bower, which requires strength, but the most beautiful one?
Prum's answer is to resuscitate Darwin's idea that the perception of beauty
is a factor in guiding reproductive choice.



If we want to look at traditional societies, we can see the time and effort
that went into decoration. There is no good survival reason to go into the
woods and bushes, given the dangers there, to gather berries to make red
dyes. (I'm sure someone will work hard to create one. Female gatherer
dominance through color-wars anyone?) Yet millennia of our ancestors have
done just that, creating decorated vessels, which could carry water just as
well without the designs. A plain rug will do to sit on. A beautiful one
soothes, stimulates, and pleases the senses. A particular local design
solidifies a community's idea of itself.



Why must this be a discussion of dominance and oppression? There is a
loveliness in life. We don't just mate; we live. Physical beauty is not
just a sign of fitness but some dazzled response to something remarkable in
the world.



------------------------------
*From: *"dave" <dave () farber net>
*To: *"ip" <ip () listbox com>
*Sent: *Friday, December 29, 2017 11:54:52 AM
*Subject: *[IP] Do Women Want to be Oppressed?

 I know I’m going to get a lot of noise on this one djf

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: John Horgan <jhorgan () stevens edu>
Date: Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:41 AM
Subject: Do Women Want to be Oppressed?
To: Dave Farber <farber () gmail com>
CC: John Horgan <jhorgan () stevens edu>


Dave, I thought members of your list might find this column interesting.
John Horgan


Do Women Want to be Oppressed?: Evolutionary theorists claim that female
desire for domineering males helped create a patriarchal world.



In principle, evolutionary psychology, which seeks to understand our
behavior in light of the fact that we are products of natural selection,
can give us deep insights into ourselves. In practice, the field often
reinforces insidious prejudices. That was the theme of my recent column “Darwin
Was Sexist, and So Are Many Modern Scientists
<https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/darwin-was-sexist-and-so-are-many-modern-scientists/>
.”



The column provoked such intense pushback that I decided to write this
follow-up post. Alt-right pundit Steve Sailer described my column as “science
denialism
<http://www.unz.com/isteve/science-denialism-in-scientific-american/>.”
Psychologist Jordan Peterson deplored “the descent of *Scientific American*.
<https://www.facebook.com/drjordanpeterson/posts/1629724667091662>”*
Scientific American* columnist Michael Shermer called me the “PC police of
the [*Scientific American*] web site
<https://www.facebook.com/Michael.Brant.Shermer/posts/10154878902781386>.”



Political scientist Charles Murray complained
<https://twitter.com/charlesmurray/status/943599091740741632> that *Scientific
American* “has been adamantly PC since before PC was a thing,” which as
someone who began writing for the magazine in 1986 I take as a compliment.
Murray, famed for contending in *The Bell Curve* that biology underpins
racial inequality, has proposed similar arguments to explain female
inequality <http://www.aei.org/publication/where-are-the-female-einsteins/>.



Critics of my column see themselves as courageous defenders of scientific
truth, and yet they prefer “truth” that confirms their conviction that
biology underpins inequality. If you question these claims, you are a
“social justice warrior.” So what does that make them? Social *injustice*
warriors?...



Now let’s take a closer look at a claim advanced by evolutionary
psychologist Geoffrey Miller, whom I cited in my previous column. In his
2000 book *The Mating Mind*, Miller argues that sexual selection can
account for differences between males and females. Darwin proposed sexual
selection to explain puzzles like the tail of the peacock, which from a
practical point of view seems to diminish fitness. Darwin hypothesized that
females have chosen to mate with, or selected, peacocks with large tails,
thus propagating this trait. Miller suggests that sexual selection can help
explain why males dominate women in many realms of culture...


Continue reading at
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/do-women-want-to-be-oppressed/
​
Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now>
<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/3340983-75473f45> | Modify
<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now
<https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?&&post_id=20171229115510:06170A76-ECB9-11E7-9A07-B2A5CA6CFF97>
<http://www.listbox.com>



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20171229162947:62F664DC-ECDF-11E7-98ED-95B3AA1001F0
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com