Interesting People mailing list archives

Re NYTimes: U.C. Irvine Rescinds Acceptances for Hundreds of Applicants


From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 09:29:38 -0400




Begin forwarded message:

From: Denise Caruso <dmcar () andrew cmu edu>
Date: August 2, 2017 at 8:49:33 AM EDT
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Cc: ip <ip () listbox com>
Subject: Re: [IP] Re NYTimes: U.C. Irvine Rescinds Acceptances for Hundreds of Applicants

Dear Bruce, 

Beg to differ. Choosing the university you attend is a life-altering experience, in no way analogous to deciding when 
to fly to Cleveland. The process *is* wrong and, I would say, unethical — not only is it driven by greed alone, but 
worse, it is contemptuous of the lives of the students who have invested time and money and hopes for the future into 
the selection process. 
--
Denise Caruso
Interdisciplinary Research 
Writing Across Disciplines
Carnegie Mellon University
+1 (412) 268-3001






On Jul 31, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Dave Farber <farber () gmail com> wrote:




Begin forwarded message:

From: Krulwich <krulwich () yahoo com>
Date: July 31, 2017 at 5:13:14 AM EDT
To: <dave () farber net>, ip <ip () listbox com>
Subject: Re: [IP] Re NYTimes: U.C. Irvine Rescinds Acceptances for Hundreds of Applicants
Reply-To: Krulwich <krulwich () yahoo com>

Anyone that's run processes like this knows that it's not so simple. Yes, tech can help, but if you know your 
accept rate is going to be a lot less than 100%, or your cancellation rate will be significant, you need to accept 
more than 100% and gamble on the accept/cancel rates or you're shooting yourself in the foot. This relates to 
everything from college acceptances to job search to selling seats on airplanes.

In the example given previously, if it takes a week for the early acceptances to decide, during that week the 
college will lose a lot of people who will get their acceptances after the "no"'s start to come in. Say they accept 
X but are going to end up accepting X+Y after Y people in the first batch say no. People in the Y group but not the 
X group may have gotten other acceptances and may take one, but if they were accepted from the start would have 
accepted here.

This is the reason airlines offer cash for seats occasionally. The number of times that that happens, and the 
inconvenience to passengers, is worth it to fill the plane by slightly overaccepting.

In the college case, they need to figure out what to do. I agree that retracting the acceptances is wrong. But it 
doesn't make the process wrong, it just means they need to figure out a solution.

--Bruce


On Monday, July 31, 2017, 6:59:59 AM GMT+3, Dave Farber <farber () gmail com> wrote:





Begin forwarded message:

From: "Synthesis:Law and Technology" <synthesis.law.and.technology () gmail com>
Date: July 30, 2017 at 5:15:39 PM EDT
To: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: Re: [IP] NYTimes: U.C. Irvine Rescinds Acceptances for Hundreds of Applicants

Dave,

I must be missing something here.  The stated reason is too many people accepted the offers. So why offer too 
many? What's wrong with waiting lists?  What criteria were used, I refuse to believe that all successful 
applicants exactly made it to the same degree.  Waiting lists for acceptance have been around since...well... 
before my time at least.  I was on the wait list for my chosen med school but law was most excited to have me.  By 
the time med school recognized my inherent " superiority" and offered me a place, I was already reading up for 
first term.  I can guarantee they found someone further on the list to replace.  And this was all done without 
massive computer systems. Someone accepts an offer? "Boop" someone at the end is no longer on the wait list.  Or 
left there just in case.  It's really trivial at that point.  And scalable.  You do a manual override to accept 
more than the quota for history? The overall number gets decreased in the faculty.  There just seems no need for 
this.


On Jul 30, 2017 2:25 PM, "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com> wrote:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/ 07/29/us/uc-irvine-acceptance- rejected.html?smprod=nytcore- 
ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share

With too many applicants vying to enter the Class of 2021, the university had to rescind acceptance letters for 
499 students. Dozens have appealed.


------------------------------ -------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/ member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/ member/archive/rss/247/126708- d3e896e0
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/ member/?&id_ secret=126708-e5b395dc
Unsubscribe Now: https://www.listbox.com/ unsubscribe/?& & post_id=20170730141058: 6E38527E-7552-11E7-BA5D- 
812CD22B7218
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Archives  | Modify Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now        




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20170802092948:A5E9ADEA-7786-11E7-A8DC-A4EA3BA48C6D
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: