Interesting People mailing list archives

re DHS: Net monitoring for homeland terror


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:18:26 -0400



Reply to. dave () farber net

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary security deserve neither liberty nor 
security.”   Benjamin Franklin 

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Lin, Herb" <HLin () nas edu>
Date: June 20, 2010 10:05:23 PM EDT
To: "dave () farber net" <dave () farber net>, ip <ip () v2 listbox com>
Subject: RE: [IP] DHS: Net monitoring for homeland terror


Without commenting on whether Rick is correct, I note that this is the first time I’ve seen any senior government 
official acknowledge that there are tradeoffs at all.  That in itself has to be a good thing, regardless of whether 
you believe that the scope will expand or whether Napolitano is right.
 
Herb Lin
Computer Science and Telecommunications Board
National Academies
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] 
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 11:57 AM
To: ip
Subject: [IP] DHS: Net monitoring for homeland terror
 
 
 
Reply to. <mailto:dave () farber net> dave () farber net
 
 
 
Begin forwarded message:
 
 
 
        From: Richard Forno <rforno () infowarrior org>
        Date: June 19, 2010 9:21:15 PM EDT
        To: List Infowarrior <infowarrior () attrition org>
        Cc: Farber Dave <dave () farber net>
        Subject: DHS: Net monitoring for homeland terror
       
       
 
       
        I'm sure the USG will pledge this will be done ONLY for 'terrorism' yet how long before it is extended to 
other crimes?  Remember that's what happened with the so-called USA PATRIOT act.....how many extensions/abuses of 
that 'terrorism' law have been discovered? This will be a First Amendment nightmare, IMHO.   -rick
       
        Napolitano: Internet Monitoring Needed to Fight Homegrown Terrorism
       
        Published June 18, 2010
       
        | Associated Press
       
        http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/18/napolitano-internet-monitoring-needed-fight-homegrown-terrorism/
       
       
        WASHINGTON -- Fighting homegrown terrorism by monitoring Internet communications is a civil liberties 
trade-off the U.S. government must make to beef up national security, the nation's homeland security chief said 
Friday.
       
        As terrorists increasingly recruit U.S. citizens, the government needs to constantly balance Americans' civil 
rights and privacy with the need to keep people safe, said Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.
       
        But finding that balance has become more complex as homegrown terrorists have used the Internet to reach out 
to extremists abroad for inspiration and training. Those contacts have spurred a recent rash of U.S.-based terror 
plots and incidents.
       
        "The First Amendment protects radical opinions, but we need the legal tools to do things like monitor the 
recruitment of terrorists via the Internet," Napolitano told a gathering of the American Constitution Society for Law 
and Policy.
       
        Napolitano's comments suggest an effort by the Obama administration to reach out to its more liberal, 
Democratic constituencies to assuage fears that terrorist worries will lead to the erosion of civil rights.
       
        The administration has faced a number of civil liberties and privacy challenges in recent months as it has 
tried to increase airport security by adding full-body scanners, or track suspected terrorists traveling into the 
United States from other countries.
       
        "Her speech is sign of the maturing of the administration on this issue," said Stewart Baker, former 
undersecretary for policy with the Department of Homeland Security. "They now appreciate the risks and the trade-offs 
much more clearly than when they first arrived, and to their credit, they've adjusted their preconceptions."
       
        Underscoring her comments are a number of recent terror attacks over the past year where legal U.S. residents 
such as Times Square bombing suspect Faisal Shahzad and accused Fort Hood, Texas, shooter Maj. Nidal Hasan, are 
believed to have been inspired by the Internet postings of violent Islamic extremists.
       
        And the fact that these are U.S. citizens or legal residents raises many legal and constitutional questions.
       
        Napolitano said it is wrong to believe that if security is embraced, liberty is sacrificed.
       
        She added, "We can significantly advance security without having a deleterious impact on individual rights in 
most instances. At the same time, there are situations where trade-offs are inevitable."
       
        As an example, she noted the struggle to use full-body scanners at airports caused worries that they would 
invade people's privacy.
       
        The scanners are useful in identifying explosives or other nonmetal weapons that ordinary metal-detectors 
might miss -- such as the explosives that authorities said were successfully brought on board the Detroit-bound 
airliner on Christmas Day by Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. He is accused of trying to detonate a bomb hidden in 
his underwear, but the explosives failed, and only burned Abdulmutallab.
       
        U.S. officials, said Napolitano, have worked to institute a number of restrictions on the scanners' use in 
order to minimize that. The scans cannot be saved or stored on the machines by the operator, and Transportation 
Security Agency workers can't have phones or cameras that could capture the scan when near the machine.
       
 
Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now>   <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/>        
 <http://www.listbox.com>          



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: