Interesting People mailing list archives

Small Plane "Threat"; Been there, done that


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:03:19 -0500





Begin forwarded message:

From: "Brock N. Meeks" <bnmeeks () verizon net>
Date: February 19, 2010 11:39:11 PM EST
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Small Plane "Threat"; Been there, done that


Dave,

Here’s an old MSNBC article I wrote on the lax security of America’s general aviation airports. I remembered it after seeing w hat Joe Stack had done flying a plane into the IRS building in Austi n. And remember, my story is seven years old, circa 2003.

Big Holes Seen in Aviation Security
By Brock N. Meeks
MSNBC

11-18-2003

No screening for thousands of private flights, passengers

WASHINGTON, Nov. 18 — Federal workers at the nation’s largest commercial airports screen everything from toddlers to tennis shoes, but there are few such requirements in place for the more than 200, 000 privately owned planes located at more than 19,000 airports in t he U.S. that make up the country’s general aviation sector. That fac t was noted in recent congressional testimony by a General Accountin g Office official to underscore findings that general aviation is “f ar more open and potentially vulnerable than commercial aviation.”

THE Transportation Security Administration has “taken limited action to improve general aviation security,” since Sept. 11, 2001, GAO’s Cathleen Berrick, director of Homeland Security and Justice Is sues, told the Senate Commerce Committee during a Nov. 5 hearing on aviation security. The vulnerability of general aviation stems, in large part, Berrick said, from the fact that “pilots and passengers are not screened bef ore takeoff and the contents of general aviation planes are not scre ened at any point.”

That’s true for the vast majority of flights in the general aviation , which is broadly defined as “all aviation other than commercial ai rlines and military aviation” that includes “small, single-engine pistons to mid-size turboprops to large turbofans capable of flying non-stop from New York to Tokyo,” according to the General Aviation Manufacturers Association.

About four percent of all general aviation flights, those planes weighing 12,500 pounds or more, must adhere to the security regulations laid out in a federal law known as the “twelve-five” rule. Crews on these aircraft must undergo criminal history checks. Operators of “twelve-five” aircraft “must adopt and carry out a security program approved by TSA to ensure that passengers and their accessible property are screened prior to boarding,” says an entry in the Federal Register noting the implementation of the rule.

But implementation of those rules is spotty; there’s no routine fede ral inspection to ensure adherence with them, though a TSA spokesman said the agency does conduct regular inspections to “to ensure that the rules are being implemented.”

According to the GAO, which is the investigative arm of Congress, about 70 percent of all general aviation planes are four- to six- seat, single-engine, piston-driven propeller planes. These types of planes, like a Cessna 172, cruise about 145 mph and fully loaded weigh less than a Honda Civic.

May 2003 advisory note In May, the Department of Homeland Security issued a warning to the general aviation community that terrorists were interested in using small planes packed with explosives to attack U.S. targets. The basis of the warning came on the heels of a foiled plot to fly “obtain a small fixed-wing aircraft or helicopter [loaded with] with explosives” and crash it into the U.S. Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, the warning said. The warning noted that such a plot demonstrated “al-Qaida’s continued fixation with using explosives-laden small aircraft in attacks.” The warning noted that the impact from such an explosion would be akin to “a medium-sized truck bomb.”

Because of lax security measures, such planes could easily be rented with just a credit card or simply stolen, the warning suggests. In Berrick’s testimony, she notes that 70 general aviation aircraft hav e been stolen in the last five years, “indicating a potential weakne ss that could be exploited by terrorists.”

Such vulnerability “was demonstrated” in January of 2002, Berrick said, “when a teenage flight student stole and crashed a single-engi ne airplane into a Tampa, Fla., skyscraper.”

But such statements and examples are viewed with skepticism by those with vested interests in general aviation. “We basically feel that the whole premise that the typical [general aviation] aircraft can be used as a terrorist weapon is flawed,” sai d Chris Dancy, a spokesman for the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Associ ation. “These small planes just don’t have the kinetic energy, don’t have the carrying capacity to be an effective weapon,” Dancy said. In addition, there’s never been a verified episode of a small plane actually being used in a terrorist incident, the associa tion says.

RISK MANAGEMENT
There are no overarching federal guidelines for security at general aviation airports despite the fact that some of these airports rank among the nation’s Top 20 in terms of overall traffic.

Part of the problem is that general aviation airports cover a wide- range of facilities, from rural to urban. “The 2,000-foot, grass str ip, public use airport that’s privately owned, does not have the sam e needs as a large general aviation airport like Manassas in Washing ton, and TSA has sort of set up the machinery to let those airports assess their needs and act accordingly,” Dancy said.

Of the 19,000 general aviation airports in the U.S., 5,400 are publicly owned, the GAO says, and “TSA is currently focusing its eff orts on these publicly owned airports. ... TSA is still unclear abou t its role in inspecting privately owned general aviation airports.”

To help set up some kind of standard, TSA is leaning heavily on the industry itself. The agency “set up the aviation security advisory c ommittee, which is helping to develop check lists for individual air ports to assess their security needs and then take appropriate actio n,” Dancy said. That committee will later this month deliver a range of security recommendations to TSA that will then be used to set up a tiered system of security practices. “Unlike the air carrier airp orts, one size cannot fit all for general aviation,” Dancy said.

Working with groups like AOPA, TSA has instituted a number of measures to help increase the level the security surrounding general aviation, said Brian Turmail, an agency spokesman.

One of the major programs is “airport watch,” which functions much like a “neighborhood watch” program that encourages pilots to keep an eye out for suspicious behavior, Turmail said. The progra m includes a government-sponsored hotline for pilots to call and rep ort any concerns. Other steps TSA has taken include putting flight restrictions in place for national sporting events and working with local law enforcement to visually identify pilots of banner towing airplanes.

TSA, in conjunction with the Federal Aviation Administration cross- referenced “every single airman’s certificate with our list of known foreign terrorists and known threats to civil aviation,” Turma il said. As a result of those efforts, the FAA revoked the certifica tes of some 20 pilots over the last 18 months, Turmail said.

Turmail acknowledged the difficulties of crafting a security program to deal with the challenges created by general aviation. “Our approach can be summed up as threat-based, risk-managed,” Turmail said. “What is the threat posed by certain types of aircraft and how do we allocate limited resources to put in place the best p ossible security?”

‘LOW-HANGING FRUIT’
Sometimes that means just reaching for the “low-hanging fruit,” like implementing “airport watch” type programs, working with local police to verify banner towing aircraft or placing flight rest rictions over “clearly visible targets like Washington, D.C., and at times, New York City,” Turmail said.

And TSA also is beefing up the paper-trail security by working with Treasury Department to implement new guidelines on aircraft purchases to flag things like all-cash transactions and third-party payments, Turmail said. TSA also is working with the Justice Department to implement a flight-training candidate check program that highlights foreigners seeking U.S.-certified training in the operation of larger aircraft.

Despite general aviation’s best efforts, small planes continue to be seen as a major risk. Just last week, a single-engine plane “punctu red the bubble” of the flight-restricted zone surrounding the White House; an errant pilot had simply wandered off course.

Far from being a “non-event,” the incident caused NORAD to scramble a couple of F-16 fighters to intercept the perceived threat . Although the president and first lady weren’t in the White House a t the time, the vice president and other senior members of the White House staff were immediately moved to a secure location by the Secr et Service until the threat was gone.



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: