Interesting People mailing list archives
The IETF and the SmartGrid
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:29:53 -0400
Begin forwarded message:
From: Richard Shockey <richard () shockey us> Date: October 5, 2009 19:09:35 EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: FW: The IETF and the SmartGrid
For IP if interested... ********* To: ietf () ietf org Subject: The IETF and the SmartGridThe general internet community needs to be aware of activities in North America that directly relate to the use of IETF protocols in the Electric Utility industry. This activity is generally referred to as the SmartGrid. Though the issues immediately deal with technical and policy decisions in the US and Canada, the SmartGrid concept is gaining significant momentum inEurope and Asia as well. http://www.smartgrids.eu/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_grid#Countries The SmartGrid has many definitions but as a practical matter it is a substantial re-architecture of the data communications networks that utilities use to maintain the stability and reliability of their powergrids. Many of the requirements for the SmartGrid in North America came out of the 2003 North East power outage which demonstrated a substantial lack ofinvestment in Utility IT systems. http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/Files/20040915141105-blackout.pdfOf particular note, is the desire by utilities to extend the reach of their communications networks directly to the utility meter and beyond ultimatelyinto the customer premise itself. This is generally referred to as the Advanced Meter Interface (AMI). One of the use cases driving thisrequirement is the next generation of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. The utilities, correctly IMHO, want to precisely control the timing of how these vehicles are recharged so not to create a unique form of DOS attack and take out the grid when everyone goes home at night. This is a principal use casein 6lowpan ( ID below ). Increasingly energy flows are becoming bi-directional creating needs for more computational intelligence and capability at the edge. What is going on? Why should the IETF community care? The United States Government, as part of the Energy Independence andSecurity Act of 2007 gave the National Institute of Standards and Technology ( NIST ) principal responsibility "to coordinate development of a frameworkthat includes protocols and model standards" for the SmartGrid. http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid/After several meetings sponsored by NIST in recent months, NIST released a preliminary report. Several folks from the IETF community attended those meetings, myself included. There multiple troubling stories about how thosemeetings were organized but I'll leave those tales to others. http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/smartgrid_interoperability.pdfOne of the requests from NIST and the SmartGrid community was a list of Core Internet protocols that NIST could refer to. Fred Baker has been working onthat task. ( below )Myself and others are deeply concerned by how this effort is developing. There is no current consensus on what the communications architecture of theSmartGrid is or how IP actually fits into it.The Utility Industry does not understand the current IPv4 number exhaust problem and the consequences of that if they want to put a IP address onevery Utility Meter in North America.What is equally troubling is that many of the underlying protocols that utilities wish to deploy are not engineered for IPv6. We have an example ofthat in a recent ID. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-c1222-transport-over-ip-01.txt Obviously, there are significant CyberSecurity issues in the SmartGridconcept and NIST has produced a useful document outlining the requirementsand usecases. http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/drafts/nistir-7628/draft-nistir-7628.pdfHow the SmartGrid interfaces with or bridges with Home Area or EnterpriseLocal Area networks is unclear, to put it mildly.I want to use this message to encourage the community to read the attached documents and get involved in this effort as appropriate. Additional NISTdocuments will be published shortly with a open public comment period.I strongly urge members of the IETF community to participate in this commentperiod and lend its expertise as necessary. It's useful and important work. ************************ Title : Core Protocols in the Internet Protocol Suite Author(s) : F. Baker Filename : draft-baker-ietf-core-03.txt Pages : 32 Date : 2009-10-03This note attempts to identify the core of the Internet Protocol Suite. Thetarget audience is NIST, in the Smart Grid discussion, as they have requested guidance on how to profile the Internet Protocol Suite. Ingeneral, that would mean selecting what they need from the picture presentedhere. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-ietf-core-03.txt Title : Design and Application Spaces for 6LoWPANs Author(s) : E. Kim, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-04.txt Pages : 30 Date : 2009-10-01This document investigates potential application scenarios and use cases for low-power wireless personal area networks (LoWPANs). This document providesdimensions of design space for LoWPAN applications.A list of use cases and market domains that may benefit and motivate the work currently done in the 6LoWPAN WG is provided with the characterisitcis of each dimention. A complete list of practical use cases is not the goalof this document. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-04.txt Richard Shockey PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683 <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> skype/AIM: rshockey101 LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/rshockey101 _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf () ietf org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- The IETF and the SmartGrid Dave Farber (Oct 05)