Interesting People mailing list archives

Comparing funding disclosures of Public Knowledge, New America, PFF, ITIF


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:03:32 -0400





Begin forwarded message:

From: "Ronald J Riley (RJR)" <rjr () rjriley com>
Date: October 20, 2009 15:49:08 EDT
To: dave () farber net
Subject: RE: [IP] Comparing funding disclosures of Public Knowledge, New America, PFF, ITIF


Dave, for IP if you wish.

I find the claim of being supported by foundations interesting because it is a fact that quite a number of nasty patent pirating corporations have their own foundations which just happen to support so called public interest entities which also just happen to support the parent corporations’ agendas in a multitude of ways.

Maybe I am too cynical, but in over a decade of fighting attempts by large transnational corporations who are unable to produce significant inventions for themselves to undermine inventor property rights I have noticed that the one area where they are creative is in sleazy public relations, or should I say propaganda campaigns. I have also noticed that they commonly pick misleading names such as Public Patent Foundation, Coalition for Patent Fairness, Public Knowledge, and the list goes on. They always have an agenda which is anything but public spirited.

One last point, another common tactic is to hand out awards to people who may actually be public spirited as cover for their more nefarious activities.

Ronald J. Riley,


I am speaking only on my own behalf.
Affiliations:
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (810) 597-0194 / (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.


From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 9:26 AM
To: ip
Subject: [IP] Comparing funding disclosures of Public Knowledge, New America, PFF, ITIF

It is a lot more complicated in that one really needs to tunnel down into who funds the funders.

ALSO I DO NOT PERSONALLY CHALLENGE POSTED ARTICLES UNLESS THEY ARE OBVIOUS LIES OR OVERLY HOSTILE. I HAVE OFTEN SAID THIS BUT PEOPLE DON'T READ DJF

DAVE

Begin forwarded message:

From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed () reed com>
Date: October 20, 2009 12:01:27 PM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Cc: ip <ip () v2 listbox com>
Subject: Comparing funding disclosures of Public Knowledge, New America, PFF, ITIF

Since IP has chosen to post a statement that implies that certain DC firms are not disclosing when they are supported by corporate interestes, I thought I'd do a little online research. Perhaps this would be a bit more "fair and balanced" than the unchallenged statement you posted, Dave.

It's worth pointing out that Public Knowledge is a "public interest group". New America Foundation is a "nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy institute that invests in new thinkers and new ideas". That makes it a "think tank" doing research, not a public interest group. This is quite different. One attempts to represent a particular segment of public interest. The other does research and reports to provide analysis and understanding.

Not mentioned by the accuser, but included for my comparison, are two other prominent policy actors with regard to the Internet, PFF and ITIF. They are, like New America, think-tanks, and not "public interest groups".

PFF is a "market-oriented think tank that studies the impact of the digital revolution and its implications for public policy"

ITIF is a "non-partisan research and educational institute - a think- tank - whose mission is to formulate and promote public polices to advance technological innovation and productivity internationally, in Washington, and in the states".

Now let's look at disclosure of funding!  This was interesting.

I checked what Public Knowledge discloses, since it was attacked by another poster as "actually taking money from corporations". Here's their disclosure, quite publicly available on their website. [Please note that I am not affiliated with Public Knowledge, though I did receive an award from them a few years ago, perhaps because they find that I serve the public interest.]

http://www.publicknowledge.org/about/who/funders

The bulk of their money seems to come from foundations, unless the claim is that the pie chart lies. They disclose every corporate donor and foundation.

I also found that New America prominently discloses its funding: http://www.newamerica.net/about/funding
and the bulk seems to be foundations as well. [Please note that I am not affiliated with New America either, though I have helped them by providing information to their staff on some reports in the past].

PFF is a somewhat more vague, but pretty clearly corporate funded:
    http://www.pff.org/about/supporters.html
Note that it says "supporters ... include" but it does not indicate either level of funding or discount that there might be substantial funders not on the list on that page. I would also note that Google is a supporter of PFF - I doubt that means that Google directs their work. [I am not affiliated with PFF, though I have participated in events hosted by Adam Thierer when he was at Cato before PFF].

Now let's look at ITIF. I have searched its site comprehensively. I cannot find any disclosure of its sources of funding whatever, neither "type of funding" nor "names of prominent funders". [I am not affiliated with ITIF]

What is most interesting to me is that the organizations who disagree with PK and New America Foundation are the ones whose funding disclosures are the least complete, and in one case, apparently entirely dominated by corporations.










Archives





-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: