Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Ambrose Bierce on Corporations
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:59:41 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: "Jim O'Donnell" <eugippius () gmail com> Date: March 24, 2009 8:27:41 AM EDT To: dave () farber net Cc: ip <ip () v2 listbox com> Subject: Re: [IP] Re: Ambrose Bierce on Corporations Of course, if you didn't have corporations, then people who wanted to create large-scale research and teaching organizations would have to agree to back any financial losses those institutions faced with their personal resources. And a fellow who invented a new energy-efficient engine would be personally liable for the lawsuits of the big corporations trying to stifle his little startup. The ingenuity might be a little more functional than Mr. Bierce wanted to say. Jim O'Donnell
From: Paul Saffo <paul () saffo com> Date: March 22, 2009 3:13:27 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Ambrose Bierce on Corporations From the Devil's Dictionary: CORPORATION, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. (or, as Pogo reminded us long ago, "We have met the enemy and he is us..." -p ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Ambrose Bierce on Corporations David Farber (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Ambrose Bierce on Corporations David Farber (Mar 24)
- Re: Ambrose Bierce on Corporations David Farber (Mar 26)