Interesting People mailing list archives
"Terms of Use" vs EULAs
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:36:37 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Albert Lukaszewski <alukaszewski () acm org> Date: June 21, 2009 3:39:50 PM EDT To: David Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: For IP: "Terms of Use" vs EULAs Dear Dave,In preparing to launch a web service, I have been looking into sites' "Terms of Use" with particular regard to database copyright. Most sites tend to render their terms with much the same restrictions and framework as EULAs. However, as far as I can tell, the legal status of "Terms of Use" pages are not established. I am familiar with ProCD Inc. v. Zeidenberg, wherein breach of contract was assessed because of the EULA involved. But website terms do not seem to naturally follow - particularly when they would be binding on the web visitor (as opposed to limiting the liability of the publisher). Can one truly be bound to "Terms of Use" simply by visiting a website? I would appreciate your passing this message on to IP in the hope that the legal expertise on the list might be able to shed light on this question.
Many thanks in advance for your consideration and for administering such a helpful list.
Albert Lukaszewski Albert Lukaszewski, PhD St Andrews, Scotland Mit Arbeit kommt gut Glück. ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- "Terms of Use" vs EULAs David Farber (Jun 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "Terms of Use" vs EULAs David Farber (Jun 22)
- "Terms of Use" vs EULAs David Farber (Jun 23)