Interesting People mailing list archives

Re: A provokative pov -- screening gets slammed by federal judge


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:43:36 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: Bruce R Koball <bkoball () well com>
Date: July 8, 2009 7:06:45 PM EDT
To: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Cc: ip <ip () v2 listbox com>
Subject: Re: [IP] Re: A provokative pov -- screening gets slammed by federal judge

Evidence is thrown out all the time by the courts when law enforcement hasn't played by the rules. Yes, some of those rules can be fuzzy but most of them are bright line law as far as I'm aware.

what about when they do things that are good for us?

I'm sure LE could be a lot more effective if we ignored the Fourth Amendment entirely.

-brk-

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, David Farber wrote:



Begin forwarded message:

From: Robert Siegel <rob () casasiegel com>
Date: July 8, 2009 3:57:46 PM EDT
To: Dave Farber <dave () FARBER NET>
Subject: Re: [IP] TSA screening gets slammed by federal judge

Dave,

Dumb question to you and the list:

If a TSA member caught people using fake passports, isn't that a good thing for the citizenry? I've listened to the audio tape from Mr. Bierfeldt's experience, and I agree that the TSA representatives behaved incorrectly in that instance, but if these folks can catch people who might be smuggling drugs or people illegally (into prostitution, slavery, etc.), shouldn't we
be happy about that?

While I grant that "increasing scope" on negative things is a real pain,
what about when they do things that are good for us?  Personally, I'm
psyched someone caught some bad guys smuggling fake passports.

Best,

Rob



On 7/8/09 7:01 AM, "Dave Farber" <dave () farber net> wrote:

Begin forwarded message:
From: Richard Forno <rforno () infowarrior org>
Date: July 8, 2009 9:20:26 AM EDT
To: Undisclosed-recipients: <>;
Cc: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: TSA screening gets slammed by federal judge
JULY 7, 2009, 11:14 P.M. ET
Is Tougher Airport Screening Going Too Far?
By SCOTT MCCARTNEY
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204556804574261940842372518*.html
The Transportation Security Administration has moved beyond just
checking for weapons and explosives. It’s now training airport
screeners to spot anything suspicious, and then honoring them when
searches lead to arrests for crimes like drug possession and credit-
card fraud.
But two court cases in the past month question whether TSA searches—
which the agency says have broadened to allow screeners to use more
judgment—have been going too far.
A federal judge in June threw out seizure of three fake passports from
a traveler, saying that TSA screeners violated his Fourth Amendment
rights against unreasonable search and seizure. Congress authorizes
TSA to search travelers for weapons and explosives; beyond that, the
agency is overstepping its bounds, U.S. District Court Judge Algenon
L. Marbley said.
Two recent court cases question whether TSA searches have been going
too far.
“The extent of the search went beyond the permissible purpose of
detecting weapons and explosives and was instead motivated by a desire
to uncover contraband evidencing ordinary criminal wrongdoing,” Judge
Marbley wrote.
In the second case, Steven Bierfeldt, treasurer for the Campaign for
Liberty, a political organization launched from Ron Paul’s
presidential run, was detained at the St. Louis airport because he was
carrying $4,700 in a lock box from the sale of tickets, T-shirts,
bumper stickers and campaign paraphernalia. TSA screeners quizzed him
about the cash, his employment and the purpose of his trip to St.
Louis, then summoned local police and threatened him with arrest
because he responded to their questions with a question of his own:
What were his rights and could TSA legally require him to answer?
Mr. Bierfeldt recorded the encounter on his iPhone and the American
Civil Liberties Union filed suit in June against Homeland Security
Secretary Janet Napolitano, claiming in part that Mr. Bierfeldt’s
experience at the airport was not an anomaly.
“Whether as a matter of formal policy or widespread practice, TSA now
operates on the belief that airport security screening provides a
convenient opportunity to fish for evidence of criminal conduct far
removed from the agency’s mandate of ensuring flight safety,” the ACLU
said in its suit.
‘Mission Creep’?
TSA said in a statement on the Bierfeldt incident that travelers are
required to cooperate with screeners, and while it is legal to carry
any amount of money when flying domestically, the agency believes
cooperation includes answering questions about property. As a result
of the recording, however, TSA determined that “the tone and language
used by the TSA employee was inappropriate and proper disciplinary
action was taken.”
The cases will likely inflame TSA critics and frequent travelers who
believe screeners take a heavy-handed approach and worsen the hassle
of getting through airports with layers of rules and sometimes
inconsistent policies between different cities.
“TSA agents don’t get to play cops,” says Ben Wizner, an attorney who
filed Mr. Bierfeldt’s suit. The ACLU has heard an increasing number of
reports of TSA agents involved in what he called “mission creep,” he
says.
snip
-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com







-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: