re Levin hints at Broadband Plan

[Dave Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Joly MacFie <joly () punkcast com>
> Date: December 25, 2009 4:15:20 AM EST
> To: dave () farber net
> Cc: richard () bennett com
> Subject: Re: [IP] Levin hints at Broadband Plan

> What made my jaw drop in Levin's remarks were that, while summarily  
> ruling out structural/functional separation, he happily foresaw a  
> future for most US citizens where the choice was between 50mpbs  
> wireline as an offering of cable companies via DOCSIS3, and wireless  
> 5mpbs via the phone companies. In his opinion it is quite possible  
> that many will decide that 5mpbs is quite satisfactory.
>
> Echoes of 640k enough for anybody?
>
> In fact wireline just does not seem to be a  big concern, seen more  
> as a lifeline. I note his 2006 remarks to the Judiciary Committee:
> "Given where we are, it is likely that the only way to drive more,  
> bigger, cheaper, and ubiquitous broadband is through new, probably  
> wireless, broadband facilities."
> http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?id=1937&wit_id=5421
>
> It appears little has occurred at the FCC to change his mind.
>
> joly
>
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 12:53 AM, David Farber <dave () farber net>  
> wrote:
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Richard Bennett <richard () bennett com>
> Date: December 24, 2009 9:15:21 PM EST
> To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
> Subject: Levin hints at Broadband Plan
>
> For IP, if you wish.
>
> Blair Levin pre-announces some details of the National Broadband  
> Plan on The Communicators this weekend. Amy Schatz of the WSJ did  
> some of the questioning, and reports:
> Providing universal broadband access at 3 mbps would cost about $20  
> billion, the FCC estimates. The price tag for 50 mbps service across  
> the U.S. would cost more than $50 billion.
>
> Much of that investment would have to come from the private sector,  
> Mr. Levin says, although the agency is considering changes to a $7  
> billion annual federal phone subsidy program to fund new Internet  
> lines in rural areas.
>
> Mr. Levin also dismissed criticisms last week from public interest  
> groups unhappy the plan may not propose some ideas for encouraging  
> competition, such as rules that would require Internet providers to  
> share their lines with competitors.
>
> “I find their criticism not very productive,” Mr. Levin said Monda 
> y.
>
> FCC officials have been considering the ideas, some of which were  
> laid out in a FCC-commissioned report by Harvard University’s Berkma 
> n Center for Internet & Society.
>
> The WSJ piece is at:
>
> http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/12/21/fcc-eyes-average-internet-speeds-for-rural-areas/
>
> and you can see the video at C-Span's web site:
>
> http://www.c-span.org/Watch/Media/2009/12/21/HP/R/27505/FCC+Gives+Status+on+Natl+Broadband+Plan.aspx
>
> RB
> --
> Richard Bennett
> Research Fellow
> Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
> Washington, DC
>
> Archives        
>
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Joly MacFie  917 442 8665 Skype:punkcast
> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
> http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com