Re: Editors note incl. Dangerous Precedents Set - Federal Criminal Charges for Violation of Commercial Online ToS?

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Wendy M. Grossman" <wendyg () pelicancrossing net>
Date: November 29, 2008 3:16:29 PM EST
To: dave () farber net
Cc: ip <ip () v2 listbox com>
Subject: Re: [IP] Re:     Editors note incl. Dangerous Precedents Set  
- Federal Criminal Charges for Violation of Commercial Online ToS?
Reply-To: wendyg () pelicancrossing net

(For IP if you wish)

David Farber wrote:
> Begin forwarded message:
> From: Gabe Goldberg <gabe () gabegold com>
> Date: November 29, 2008 1:14:01 PM EST
> To: dave () farber net
> Subject: Re: [IP] Re:   Editors note incl. Dangerous Precedence Set  
> - Federal Criminal Charges for Violation of Commercial Online ToS?

> Are loony nebulous mumbo-jumbo agreements like that actually  
> binding? Or just legal folly? Who knows.

FWIW, I tried to look at these questions a bit for the Guardian:

Software licenses / EULAs: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/apr/24/law.software

Privacy policies:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jan/10/privacy.it


wg




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com