Interesting People mailing list archives

Dangerous Precedence Set - Federal Criminal Charges for Violation of Commercial Online ToS?


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:50:43 -0500



Begin forwarded message:

From: sdpoe () airmail net
Date: November 27, 2008 12:24:49 PM EST
To: <dfarber () cs cmu edu>, <dave () farber net>
Cc: <sdpoe () acm org>
Subject: Dangerous Precedence Set - Federal Criminal Charges for Violation of Commercial Online ToS?
Reply-To: sdpoe () airmail net

Dave -

For IP, if you like. Happy Thanksgiving.

Thanks,
Stephen
---
A very dangerous legal precedence was set today.

In the case of the 13 year old who committed suicide supposedly over a MySpace hoax, the mother involved was found guilty on three federal counts. What of? Not
of a serious criminal act.

She was found guilty on three criminal counts (misdemeanors), in a federal court, of violating the Terms of Service agreement. So now you can be accused, tried, and found guilty of a federal criminal offense not for breaking a Federal or even a state law, but rather for violating the Terms of Service of a click- through
agreement of a commercial site you go to on the Web.

"Prosecutors alleged that Drew and her employee violated MySpace's "terms of service," which prohibit using fraudulent registration information, obtaining personal information about juvenile members, and using the service to harass,
abuse or harm others...

The verdict underscores the complexities of the case. Some legal experts and civil liberties groups said a felony conviction would mean that millions of people who violate the terms of service of the Web sites they visit could become criminally liable. Experts also said that if violating such terms is a crime, then the sites that write the agreements essentially could function as lawmakers
or prosecutors. "
- from the Washington Post @
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/26/AR2008112600629.html?hpid=topnews

"The case was prosecuted under the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,
originally intended to prosecute hackers. Did Lori Drew effectively hack MySpace
for nefarious purposes? Some people think it’s quite a stretch.

"This was a very aggressive, if not misguided, theory,” said Matt Levine, a New York-based defense attorney and former federal prosecutor. “Unfortunately, there’s not a law that covers every bad thing in the world. It’s a bad idea to
use laws that have very different purpose.” "
- from ZDNet @ http://government.zdnet.com/?p=4207
---- Msg sent via Internet America Webmail - www.internetamerica.com




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: