Re: weakness in the DNS protocol

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

________________________________________
From: Steven M. Bellovin [smb () cs columbia edu]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:43 AM
To: David Farber
Cc: ip
Subject: Re: [IP] weakness in the DNS protocol

On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:05:44 -0400
David Farber <dave () farber net> wrote:

> http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/bind/forgery-resilience.php
>
> A weakness in the DNS protocol may enable the poisoning of caching
> recursive resolvers with spoofed data. DNSSEC is the only full
> solution. New versions of BIND provide increased resilience to the
> attack.
It's worth noting that Paul Vixie published the basic idea behind this
attack in 1995 at Usenix Security
(http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/security95/vixie.html)
-- in a section titled "What We Cannot Fix", he wrote:

        With only 16 bits worth of query ID and 16 bits worth of UDP
        port number, it's hard not to be predictable.  A determined
        attacker can try all the numbers in a very short time and can
        use patterns derived from examination of the freely available
        BIND code. Even if we had a white noise generator to help
        randomize our numbers, it's just too easy to try them all.

As ISC notes, DNSSEC is really the path we need to follow.


                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com