Interesting People mailing list archives

Re: Spinning Black Friday Retail Sales


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:35:06 -0500



Begin forwarded message:

From: "David Chessler" <chessler () usa net>
Date: December 4, 2008 3:40:15 AM EST
To: "David Farber" <dave () farber net>
Subject: Fwd: [IP] Re:     Spinning Black Friday Retail Sales

Note the calculations on the price of gas, based on the current spot price of oil. Gas was about $1.50/gallon, or a bit less, a few years ago. When gas gets that cheap, which is probably less than the 30c a gallon from the early 70s, or the 25c I remember from the early 60s, then big gas guzzlers will be popular. My brother used to evaluate cars by how many fully loaded frame packs he could put in the trunk without removing the sleeping bags. Most large cars
could take at least 6, or one per passenger.

We can expect gas to remain cheap until we dig out of this recession, which will probably take 3 to 5 years. During this period it will be hard to sell hybrids, electric cars, Smart Cars, and other fuel-saving expedients. So there will be a lot of SUVs and trucks on the road (or whatever people can get to haul their load--small school busses, anyone?) Unless, we tax gasoline to keep
it up around $4 or more per gallon.

One important reason the auto companies are in such bad shape is that, in the US market, they can't sell the small cars they are required to build (CAFE standards) at a reasonable price. Just because you build it doesn't mean they
will come!

------ Original Message ------
Received: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:28:49 AM EST
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
To: "ip" <ip () v2 listbox com>
Subject: [IP] Re:     Spinning Black Friday Retail Sales



Begin forwarded message:

From: Tobin Maginnis <ptm () pix cs olemiss edu>
Date: December 3, 2008 7:54:28 PM EST
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] Re:    Spinning Black Friday Retail Sales

Oops, I meant oil when I said gasoline. Fixed below.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) market basket does include
gasoline. http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpifaq.htm#Question_6

But the question was how were the sales on *Black Friday*; not Cyber
Monday when Internet holiday sales begin.

Regardless, the price of gasoline is in deflation at the moment. I have
compared the spot price of oil and the average price of a gallon of
gasoline for the last eight years and noted an average "crack spread" of
3%. So as a rule-of-thumb one can multiply the spot price by 3% and see
what the price of a historic gallon of gasoline.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crack_spread

At the moment the spot price of oil is $47/barrel which should be
about $1.41/gal for gasoline. As usual, it seems easy for prices to
rise, but they come down very slowly.

================================
David Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Esther Dyson <edyson () edventure com>
Date: December 3, 2008 7:57:36 AM EST
To: dave () farber net, "ip" <ip () v2 listbox com>
Subject: Re: [IP] Re:   Spinning Black Friday Retail Sales
Yes, but if those inflation numbers include the price of gas (which
is rarely bought online!), then the bias may be overstated as well.
In other words, always look your holiday gift horses in the mouth!
and don't jump to conclusions.
Esther
At 02:19 PM 12/2/2008, David Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message:

From: Tobin Maginnis <ptm () pix cs olemiss edu>
Date: December 2, 2008 10:05:47 AM EST
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] Spinning Black Friday Retail Sales

Dave,

Barry did not take inflation into consideration which more than
accounts for the difference! Using the 1980 BLS method, inflation for
the last year has averaged more than 11%! Therefore sales figures are
actually down 11%-7% or 4%!


From: http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/download_cpi?
mode=text
             CPI-U           SGS-Alt
             Index   CPI-U   CPI-Equiv       SGS-Alt
Year    Month   1982/4=100      Yr/Yr % Index   Yr/Yr %
2007    Oct     208.9   3.54%   551.9   11.07%
2007    Nov     210.2   4.31%   556.3   11.75%
2007    Dec     210.0   4.08%   564.5   11.73%
2008    Jan     211.1   4.28%   572.2   11.80%
2008    Feb     211.7   4.03%   582.4   11.56%
2008    Mar     213.5   3.98%   589.3   11.58%
2008    Apr     214.8   3.94%   593.5   11.53%
2008    May     216.6   4.18%   599.6   11.82%
2008    Jun     218.8   5.02%   612.3   12.59%
2008    Jul     220.0   5.60%   617.8   13.36%
2008    Aug     219.1   5.37%   617.5   13.22%
2008    Sep     218.8   4.94%   619.0   12.86%
2008    Oct     216.6   3.66%   616.1   11.63%


David Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: dewayne () warpspeed com (Dewayne Hendricks)
Date: December 1, 2008 11:18:20 PM EST
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <xyzzy () warpspeed com>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] Spinning Black Friday Retail Sales
Spinning Black Friday Retail Sales
Posted By Barry Ritholtz On December 1, 2008 @ 7:11 am
<http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/spinning-black-friday-retail-sales/


A few things you can count on every year around this time:
• Sales data for Black Friday will be touted by biased interest
groups. They are invariably have an upside bias;
• Headline writers will get it wrong
• Survey data will be taken as the equivalent of actual sales;
• Strong forecasts will be subsequently proven wrong;
Such is the current situation with the Black Friday sales data, with
reports still trickling in from around the country.
The WSJ goes for a hat trick of errors, starting with this article’s
headline:
• [1] Holiday Shopping Off to Strong Start
What’s wrong with this? First, as opposed to actual sales data, they
rely on a “survey of 3,370 shoppers, the National Retail Federation
estimated shoppers spent an average of $372.57 over the weekend, up
7.2% over last year’s $347.55.” The National Retail Federation is
hardly the objective group you want crafting (or hiring 3rd parties
to create)  survey questions; 2nd, we know that humans are terrible
at forecasting their own behaviors. Historically, their projections
have had little correlation with their actual spending patterns. And
third, the headline is belied by the details contained in the
article. ([2] MarketWatch was no better)
[snip]RSS Feed: <http://www.warpspeed.com/wordpress>
-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Esther Dyson              Always make new mistakes!
EDventure Holdings
c/o Meetup, 10th floor
632 Broadway
New York, NY 10012
USA
phone: +7 964 553 3704 (or send e-mail)     by appointment or...
available Sunday night to Friday morning, 7 to 8 pm and 7 to 10 am
PST  (or 10 to 11 am GMT weekdays)
edyson () edventure com        www.edventure.com
Flickr pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edyson
Release 0.9 (blog and bio): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/esther- dyson/
or feed://www.ponyfish.com/feeds/14320hOmiDEju
"The remainder of the proof is left as an exercise for the reader."
-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com





-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com








-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: