Interesting People mailing list archives
'Old guy' gets another chance in Google age-discrimination suit
From: David Farber <dfarber () cs cmu edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:33:51 -0400
Gosh, Brian was a student when I met him. Old indeed. Maybe what bothered Google is that he knew what had been tried in the past and why it worked or failed. Makes it hard to re-invent, djf
Begin forwarded message: From: Ari Ollikainen <Ari () OLTECO com> Date: October 5, 2007 2:49:24 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: 'Old guy' gets another chance in Google age-discrimination suit For IP... 'Old guy' gets another chance in Google age-discrimination suit Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer Friday, October 5, 2007 (10-04) 19:28 PDT San Jose -- A state appeals court reinstated a fired manager's age-discrimination suit against Google Inc. on Thursday, saying a jury should hear his evidence that a supervisor told him that his ideas were "too old to matter" and that the giant search engine company gave its older employees lower ratings and lesser bonuses. The Sixth District Court of Appeal in San Jose overturned a Santa Clara County judge's dismissal of a damage suit by Brian Reid, who was hired by the Mountain View firm in 2002 as director of operations and director of engineering. He was demoted in October 2003 and fired in February 2004, at age 54. According to published reports, the firing cost Reid not only his salary of $200,000 a year but also stock options worth as much as $10 million. Reid, a former electrical engineering professor at Stanford, was given a glowing review by Google's vice president of engineering in his only written evaluation. But the same executive, Wayne Rosing, told Reid when he was fired that he was not a "cultural fit" for the company, the court said. Rosing was three years older than Reid. But another of his supervisors, Urs Hoelzle, who was 15 years younger than Reid, told him that his opinions and ideas were obsolete and "too old to matter," and that he was sluggish and lethargic, the court said. Some colleagues referred to him as an "old guy" and "fuddy-duddy." Hoelzle and a younger employee took over Reid's responsibilities when he was demoted in October 2003 to become head of a new company program with no budget or staff, the court said. Company co-founder Larry Page made the decision to fire Reid, his suit said. Page was nearly 31 at the time. As part of the lawsuit, Reid presented a statistician's study of employees and managers in his department at Google that found older employees consistently received lower evaluations than their younger colleagues, and older managers got bonuses that were 29 percent less than those awarded to managers who were 10 years younger. The court said those arguments, cited by Superior Court Judge William Elfving in his dismissal of the suit, involved factual disputes that must be resolved by a jury. E-mail Bob Egelko at begelko () sfchronicle com. http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/10/05/BA51SKDL3.DTL The comments on this story are instructive:http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article/comments/view?f=/c/a/2007/10/05/ BA51SKDL3.DTL
-- - - - "The young have aspirations that never come to pass, the old have reminiscences of what never happened." -- H.H. Munro ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- 'Old guy' gets another chance in Google age-discrimination suit David Farber (Oct 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 'Old guy' gets another chance in Google age-discrimination suit David Farber (Oct 06)