Interesting People mailing list archives
We paid to produce the research - why should we pay again to read it?
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:58:52 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: dewayne () warpspeed com (Dewayne Hendricks) Date: November 7, 2007 8:01:19 PM EST To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <xyzzy () warpspeed com>Subject: [Dewayne-Net] We paid to produce the research - why should we pay again to read it?
[Note: This item comes from reader Randall. DLH] From: Randall <rvh40 () insightbb com> Date: November 7, 2007 3:07:45 PM PSTTo: David Farber <dave () farber net>, Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com >, johnmacsgroup () yahoogroups com Subject: We paid to produce the research - why should we pay again to read it?
[Links @ the site - http://HTDAW.livedigital.com/blog/100463 ] A Step Forward for Open Access Source: Center for Science in the Public Interest, October 29, 2007The U.S. Congress has approved legislation that would provide free public access to all published research funded by the National Institutes of Health, despite a lobbying campaign by the Association of American Publishers (AAP), which includes leading scientific publishers like Elsevier, Wiley, and the American Chemical Society. Earlier this year, AAP hired the PR firm of Dezenhall Resources to campaign against open access. In August, it launched Partnership for Research Integrity in Science and Medicine (PRISM), to promote its claim that open access would undermine peer review.
------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- We paid to produce the research - why should we pay again to read it? David Farber (Nov 18)