Senate takes step away from Real ID

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Richard Forno <rforno () infowarrior org>
Date: June 28, 2007 7:42:12 AM EDT
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: Senate takes step away from Real ID



Senate takes step away from Real ID

By Declan McCullagh
http://news.com.com/Senate+takes+step+away+from+Real+ID/ 
2100-7348_3-6193735.
html

Story last modified Wed Jun 27 19:43:08 PDT 2007


The U.S. Senate took a preliminary step on Wednesday toward reining  
in the
controversial Real ID Act, which is scheduled to become America's first
federal identification card in a few years.

During Wednesday's floor debate over a massive immigration bill, Real ID
foes managed to preserve an amendment to prohibit the forthcoming
identification card from being used for mandatory employment  
verification,
signaling that the political winds have shifted from when the law was
overwhelmingly enacted two years ago.

The anti-Real ID amendment is backed by two Montana Democrats, Max  
Baucus
and Jon Tester, who say the digital ID cards represent an unreasonable
government intrusion into Americans' private lives. In April, Montana  
became
one of the states that has voted to reject Real ID.

"This was a real victory for Montana and the American people," Tester  
said,
after the Senate vote to kill their amendment failed to muster a  
majority.
The unsuccessful vote to table it was 45-52.

The Real ID Act says that, starting on May 11, 2008, Americans will  
need a
federally-approved ID card to travel on an airplane, open a bank  
account,
collect Social Security payments or take advantage of nearly any  
government
service. States must conduct checks of their citizens' identification
papers, and driver's licenses may have to be reissued to comply with
Homeland Security requirements. (States that agree in advance to  
abide by
the rules have until 2013 to comply.)

The immigration bill (Word document), which is backed by the Bush
administration and has drawn the ire of many conservatives, requires
employers to demand Real ID cards of new hires starting in 2013. It says
that "no driver's license or state identity card may be accepted if  
it does
not comply with the Real ID Act."

It also would try to siphon off opposition on privacy or federalism  
grounds
from state legislators by offering fat checks--$1.5 billion over five
years--with funds coming from the U.S. Treasury.

Baucus' and Tester's amendment (PDF) deletes the requirement for  
employer ID
verification and says that "no federal funds may be provided" to  
states to
create such a system.

Tim Sparapani, the ACLU's legislative counsel, called the vote a  
"victory
for privacy and a rejection of building an immigration system on a  
faulty
foundation, which was the Real ID Act."

"The way the bill was written," Sparapani said, "it should be seen as  
a Hail
Mary pass to save Real ID from the scrap heap."

A political sea change?
Procedurally speaking, the vote was merely a preliminary one. The
Baucus-Tester amendment itself still awaits a vote--and even if it is  
glued
onto a successful immigration bill or if the immigration bill dies a  
second
time, the underlying Real ID framework and deadlines remain in place.

That framework is estimated to cost $23.1 billion, according to the
Department of Homeland Security, and could include Americans  
outfitted with
radio frequency ID, or RFID, chips on the cards (the idea is being
considered but is not final). Personal data that's on the back of the  
card
in a two-dimensional bar code will not be encrypted because of  
"operational
complexity," meaning any business or government agency that scans the
information could record it in a database.
Now on News.com
Wardens of the Web Newsmaker: The pros and cons of iPhone security  
NASA's
new objective: Twitter and Facebook Extra: IBM creates world's most  
powerful
computer

Politically speaking, though, Wednesday's vote could be a turning  
point in
the national debate over Real ID. It indicates that a majority of  
senators
are willing to curb the controversial system, which has already led to a
kind of grassroots rebellion among the states.

The ACLU, which runs Realnightmare.org, says that 15 states have  
enacted an
anti-Real ID measure, 10 more have had such legislation approved by  
at least
one chamber, and 8 more have had it introduced in the legislature.

Homeland Security officials have defended Real ID as a way to limit  
illegal
immigrants and to thwart terrorists from obtaining driver's licenses.
Although some supporters exist in the U.S. Congress, key Democrats  
have said
the law--enacted with minimal debate as part of an emergency Iraq war
spending bill--needs to be reformed.

Other amendments (text document) to the immigration bill could affect  
any
final vote on the legislation. One amendment, backed by senators Max  
Baucus
(D), Charles Grassley (R) and Barack Obama (D), was nixed on  
Wednesday. It
would have rewritten the employment verification system and provided  
more
due process protections for American workers.

CNET News.com's Anne Broache contributed to this report




-------------------------------------------
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com