Interesting [Canadian Press] views on .xxx

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Steve Goldstein <steve.goldstein () cox net>
Date: January 6, 2007 7:49:27 PM EST
To: "David Farber [IP]" <dave () farber net>
Subject: Interesting [Canadian Press] views on .xxx



http://www.canada.com/topics/technology/news/gizmos/story.html? 
id=a40c099a-960e-4336-9f7a-4588dcf7ffae&k=56653

Saturday » January 6 » 2007

Internet oversight body revives proposal for domain name for porn

Anick Jesdanun
Canadian Press

Saturday, January 06, 2007

NEW YORK (AP) - The Internet's key oversight agency has revived a  
proposal it earlier rejected that would create an online red-light  
district, after adding stronger provisions to prohibit child  
pornography and require labelling of websites with sexually explicit  
materials.
The use of the proposed ".xxx" domain name would remain voluntary,  
but any porn sites that choose to use it instead of the more popular  
".com" would be subject to the new terms issued late Friday by the  
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers or ICANN.
The idea of a separate ".xxx" domain has generated significant  
opposition from conservative groups and even some pornography websites.
But ICANN officials said they initially rejected the proposal in May  
not because of the opposition but out of concern that the agency  
might be put in a difficult position of having to enforce all of the  
world's laws governing pornography. They noted that various counties'  
free speech laws sometimes conflict.
The new proposal does not directly address any potential conflicts in  
laws, but it calls for the company backing it, ICM Registry Inc. of  
Jupiter, Fla., to hire independent organizations to monitor porn  
sites' compliance with the new rules.
ICANN, the Marina del Rey, Calif.,-based agency designated by the  
U.S. government to oversee domain name policies, opened the proposal  
to public comment but did not indicate when it would rule.
If approved, ICM would be required to help develop mechanisms for  
promoting child safety and preventing child pornography, "including  
practices that appeal to pedophiles or suggest the presence of child  
pornography on the site."
Porn sites would have to participate in a self-descriptive labelling  
system, likely one from the Internet Content Rating Association.  
Under it, websites add tags based on such criteria as the presence of  
nudity and whether it is in an artistic or educational context, such  
as for sites on breast feeding. Relatively few sites now participate,  
although major web browsers have mechanisms for reading the tags.

ICM also would have to develop automated tools to check for  
compliance and give users ways to report violations.
ICM believes the domain would help the US$12-billion online porn  
industry clean up its act, as those using it must abide by rules  
designed to bar such trickery as spamming and malicious scripts.

Anti-porn advocates counter that sites would be free to keep their  
current ".com" address, in effect making porn more easily accessible  
by creating yet another channel to house it.
Many porn sites also objected, fearing that an ".xxx' domain would  
pave the way for governments or even private industry to filter  
speech that is protected in the United States by the First Amendment.


-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: 
Archives: http://archives.listbox.com/247/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=1788750&user_secret=f2ab41d2
Unsubscribe: http://v2.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?id=1788750-f2ab41d2-tomgxkx1
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com