Interesting People mailing list archives

more on Spectrum Gold Rush


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:17:04 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed () reed com>
Date: September 1, 2006 6:02:38 PM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Cc: ip () v2 listbox com
Subject: Re: [IP] more on Spectrum Gold Rush

Dave -

The Shannon-Hartley Theorem does not provide a limit to the communications capacity of the electromagnetic field, as Brett would have it. The Shannon-Hartley theorem describes a "channel" which is an abstraction for a single receiver which is receiving the superposition of a single signal and a gaussian noise source with bounded energy. It doesn't have any general application beyond a radio that exists at a single point in space, under that limited set of assumptions.

The Shannon Hartley theorem exists as part of a broad and useful mathematical theory, called information theory. There are indeed limits that can be calculated by using information theory, given physical assumptions. However, the following are fundamental problems in using the Shannon-Hartley theorem.

1) the physical universe is not a gaussian process. Any assumption of that sort should be tested against reality - otherwise it is merely a statement of rhetorical faith, or merely an assumption made to make analysis possible. Lightning strikes, for example, are not obviously gaussian in their effect on radios - and meteor trails, used practically to assist radio communications in some applications, are not gaussian.

2) Channels other than the simple channel described in the S-H theorem (such as so-called mult-terminal systems) have very different communications capacities. The simplest such channel is the multiple- access channel, which happens when 2 or more signals are superposed on a noise source (which may or may not be gaussian). These channels seem more appropriate for modeling large-scale networked communications. For example, one somewhat clear analysis done by Xie and Kumar under plausible assumptions (of the gaussian sort challenged above, caveat lector) concludes that the limit of capacity increases linearly with the number of transceivers in a shared medium.

The last point suggests that it may be the case that under suitable cooperative behavior (rules) radios can be designed to communicate without very serious limits.

There is clearly much to do to realize the capabilities suggested by these comments. But Brett Ellis is making a political point, not a technical point, and his politics of scarcity should be recognized as such.


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: