Interesting People mailing list archives
more on The Return of Ma Bell -- AT&T (SBC) to buy BellSouth?]]
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:40:55 -0500
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [IP] more on The Return of Ma Bell -- AT&T (SBC) to buy BellSouth?] Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 10:31:58 -0800 From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> To: Richard Perlman <perl () lucent com> CC: David Farber <dave () farber net>, Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> Richard, With all due respect, I think it's fair to say that Dave and I are reasonably well versed on Bell System history, and the details of the '84 divestiture and subsequent events. This probably isn't the proper forum for a detailed analysis of vertical and horizontal corporate relationships vis-a-vis the Bell System, and I did not attempt to present that sort of detail in the quoted message. The intricacies of the consent decree vs. the divesting of the Bell Operating Companies is of historical interest, but is of less value in the "where are we now and where do we go from here" nitty-gritty. Rather, the fundamental points are rather simple, and while the firms involved will attempt to obscure these facts they are true nonetheless. We were promised that a brave new world of competition would be opened up with the various BOCs working to compete not only regionally but for some services nationally as well. We'd have a wide range of local telephone service providers and long distance carriers to choose from. Vast numbers of ISPs would compete for our business. Instead, long distance has largely collapsed as a business, conventional local service competition left little except unnecessary area code splits, and the reconstituted telecom giants are using their lobbying power to dictate (for their own benefit) fundamental Internet topologies, skirt local video franchise rules, and otherwise aim toward taking on all of the worst aspects of the old Bell System, plus new powers that couldn't have been imagined even a couple of decades ago. That's the real story behind the headlines. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () vortex com or lauren () pfir org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, IOIC - International Open Internet Coalition - http://www.ioic.net Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com DayThink: http://daythink.vortex.com - - -
Dave, Lauren: There is a common misconception expressed in the comments (below) about the breakup and getting back together again of at&t. In 1954 the DoJ filed suit against AT&T for maintaining a vertical monopoly. The basis of the suit was that as the manufacturer of the equipment it used to operate the "Bell System" AT&T was engaging in unfair competition. In 1984, when the anti-trust suit was finally settled, it was the horizontal monopoly that was broken up, not the vertical monopoly. AT&T continued to own Western Electric, Bell Labs and the former "Long Lines." Why did AT&T give up the unchallenged horizontal monopoly? Because they thought they could make a killing in the emerging mini-computer market with their 3B20 systems - a market they had been previously excluded from by regulatory dictate. Ironically, is wasn't much more than 10 years later that AT&T effectively did what the DoJ had tried to do in 1954, when they spun-off the former Western Electric as Lucent Technologies. Even more ironic, this is exactly what Alvin Toffler recommended to AT&T in 1972 as detailed in his book "adaptive Corporation." (See http://books.global-investor.com/books/20897.htm ) So, the real "reconciliation" of AT&T would be for the new at&t to acquire Lucent - and that just is not going to happen. Check out http://www.bellsystemmemorial.com/bellopercomp.html if you are interested in the history of the 'Bell System." Richard On 3/5/06 08:22, "Dave Farber" <dave () farber net> wrote:-------- Original Message -------- Subject: The Return of Ma Bell -- AT&T (SBC) to buy BellSouth? Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 08:16:45 -0800 (PST) From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> To: dave () farber net CC: lauren () vortex com Dave, ... You'll recall the robot cop who was blasted apart into globs of mercuric metal, that flowed back together to recreate the original whole. That's what's happening now -- with the smiling approval of Congress and the FCC -- far along the path of resurrecting a new Ma Bell with powers and influence that will vastly exceed even those of the original Bell System.
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on The Return of Ma Bell -- AT&T (SBC) to buy BellSouth?]] Dave Farber (Mar 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on The Return of Ma Bell -- AT&T (SBC) to buy BellSouth?]] Dave Farber (Mar 05)