Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Emergency text messages and AB 2231
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:36:46 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> Date: March 31, 2006 4:18:15 PM EST To: dave () farber net Cc: lauren () vortex com Subject: Emergency text messages and AB 2231 Dave, In a reply to the original query, I noted some potential problems with the concept of blanket text messaging in emergency situations. Here's a summary: The issue of "regionality" is obvious and had been noted in the initial set of questions. Nowadays a phone with a particular area code doesn't necessarily indicate that the user lives or works in that vicinity. Bringing realtime location data into the mix is a significantly more complex effort. There also may be genuine capacity issues in trying to send out gobs of text messages in a short period in some cases. The text messaging infrastructure has traditionally been rather low capacity (at least compared with new data services). Another concern is that since text messages are queued, many people would potentially receive emergency text messages hours or even days after their being sent, if the targeted phones were not in range or simply were turned off when the original messages became queued. (I know many people who keep their phones turned off almost all the time, and only make occasional outgoing cell phone calls, sometimes days apart.) Such "late" alerts could be highly confusing to such people who might not notice the old date/timestamps on the messages. While it's of course possible that the cell carriers could specifically cancel out undelivered emergency text messages after some period of time, that's yet another functionality requirement beyond the extent to which all undelivered text messages might be deleted after some (possibly prolonged) interval regardless of their priority status. But a particularly insidious problem is less obvious at first glance, if we're really talking about sending text messages to *every* cell phone in a region, not just to people "subscribing" to emergency messages in advance. Many people simply do not ever use text messaging and have absolutely no idea how to deal with it. I personally know folks who get absolutely flustered if a text message notice pops up on their phone (several of these individuals -- but by no means all -- are elderly) They don't know how to read a text message. They use only the minimum functionality of the phone for simple voice calls. In fact, forcing text messages on such persons actually runs the risk of causing them to be unable to quickly make voice calls in an emergency situation. I've seen cell phone users get so confused by the text message alerts on some phones, that they don't know how to rapidly clear those phones for a voice call. This is a real and potentially serious issue that could come from forcing a type of message on people who are not familiar with them, and who may be only minimally skilled with using the phones in the first place. I have far fewer concerns (apart from possible system capacity issues) with establishing an "opt-in" emergency text notification environment. But a system that send to everyone could easily do more harm than good. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () vortex com or lauren () pfir org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, IOIC - International Open Internet Coalition - http://www.ioic.net Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com DayThink: http://daythink.vortex.com ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Emergency text messages and AB 2231 David Farber (Mar 31)