Interesting People mailing list archives
ID and Op-ed: Ideologues at the lectern
From: "David Farber" <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:20:18 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: James P. Hogan [mailto:james () jamesphogan com] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:32 AM To: dave () farber net Subject: ID and Op-ed: Ideologues at the lectern Dave, Responding to Jim O'Donnell's recent post.
I'm trying to get at the logic, if any, that underlies the complaint.
Here's the counterlogic: if belief in a scientific process of evolution is a "left" characteristic and creationism or ID is a "right" characteristic, then as a devotee of the truth, I would like to see 100% of faculty showing that "left" characteristic. The evolution gang happens to be right, no way around it.<< Before we get too dogmatic over this, let's try to step away from the religious-political wars that are currently getting all the attention, and be clear as to what the real issue is. Many scientists, mathematicians, logicians, philosophers, and others who have no religious axes or persuasion at all are open-minded toward, and in some cases strongly supportive of, the possibility of there being an intelligence of some kind at work behind what's going on. The phrase "ID versus Evolution" that the media repeats all over the place might describe the extremist form of the debate, but it creates a false dichotomy. A more accurate term would be "ID versus Darwinism," i.e. the doctrine of evolution being purely the result of unguided mechanistic processes driven by chance in the form of natural selection. While natural selection is certainly real and has its contribution, there are serious grounds for questioning the legitimacy of extrapolating far beyond the available data to credit it with being capable of doing all that it's alleged to in the way that current theory asserts. Selection can only select from what's available to be selected from. The more that becomes evident of the complexity of biological systems, especially the underlying molecular machinery as revealed in recent decades, the more problematical it becomes for more than an infinitesimally small number of the possible trial-and-error combinations to have formed even in the lifetime of the universe with all its probabilistic resources devoted to the task--and that's true for just a simple protein comprising a few hundred amino acids. As with the redesign of any highly specific and complex mechanism, too many things have to change in just the right way, all at the same time. Invoking control genes that orchestrate the turning on and off of the correct combinations of construction genes merely shifts the question to a different level. What needs to be recognized is that the confident assertion that a purely naturalistic explanation _must_ exist, which more research will uncover it one day, is just as much a declaration of faith in a metaphysical ideology--that of naturalist materialism as the sufficient and only reality--as a creationist's faith in the literal interpretation of Genesis. However else the arguments are disguised, there are ultimately only two alternatives: Either mindless matter, driven by pure chance and nothing else, possess innately the ability to organize itself for no reason into living, thinking beings and the environments necessary to sustain them; or else "something" organized it. The dominant ideology of our culture, of course, subscribes to the former. But to state that the jury is in and we "know" is premature, to say the least. Until such time as that might change, there is no valid justification for dismissing the second alternative out of hand. If happens to be true, no amount of partisan politics or judicial ruling is going to change it. That's all that the proponents of the broader ID position are saying. And if "science" resorts to the semantic evasion of eliminating such considerations by manipulating its definition, it might be excluding itself from what could be some of the most important questions confronting us. Sincerely, James Hogan Ireland ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- ID and Op-ed: Ideologues at the lectern David Farber (Jan 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- ID and Op-ed: Ideologues at the lectern David Farber (Jan 23)