more on something to dream about -- nightmare more on Oil Independence?

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Hugh Crawford <hugh-list () thoughtballoon com>
Date: September 13, 2005 1:31:18 PM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] something to dream about -- nightmare more on Oil  
Independence?


Which begs the question, why not just use the "new technology nukes  
[that] are plenty safe" ( pebble bed helium cooled nukes?) for power  
in the first place and skip the oil part?
Hugh

David Farber wrote:


> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: MLowe_turbinetool <mlowe () turbinetool com>
> Date: September 13, 2005 11:45:18 AM EDT
> To: 'David Farber' <dave () farber net>, 'Ip Ip' <ip () v2 listbox com>
> Subject: RE: more on Oil Independence?
>
>
> You won't get any CO2 if you use nukes for the power source for  
> the  heaters.
> The new technology nukes are plenty safe and will eventually get  
> used  here,
> with or without the consent of the hysterical, because it is the   
> right way.




-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/