Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Transcript of Sen. Stevens' remarks on Internet "indecency"laws
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:40:11 -0500
------ Forwarded Message From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:40:41 -0500 To: Richard Wiggins <richard.wiggins () gmail com> Cc: David Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: Re: [IP] Transcript of Sen. Stevens' remarks on Internet "indecency"laws Richard, Stevens was asked about cable indecency laws at the press conference on Friday and his response, as you say, was primarily about cable and satellite indecency. But part of his response also talked about regulating indecency on broadband and VoIP. It is muddle-headed in the extreme to say: "Well, Stevens is going to target cable and satellite first, and that was the bulk of his response, so Internet users have nothing to worry about. We'll just blissfully ignore that the chairman of a Senate committee drafting indecency laws is talking about broadband and VoIP. It must have been a slip of the tongue! Of course the Senate could never do anything *that* silly! We trust our politicians never to grandstand on indecency!" This is something akin to the Communications Decency Act being reintroduced that we're talking about here, after all, if Stevens actually goes ahead with this idea. The ACLU wasn't as blase about Stevens' remarks, and the American Family Association yesterday endorsed the concept of Internet indecency regulation (though in a different bill for tactical reasons). You may wish to read this for background: http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-5618332.html Best, Declan Richard Wiggins wrote:
Declan has mislabeled this story. The quoted remarks pertain primarily to cable TV. Although there are references to Voip and broadband, Stevens is currently riled up about television, not the Internet. The issue at hand is Stevens' proposal to treat cable television more like broadcast TV; the latter has always been under Federal regulation for decency, while the former has not. This is a broader story than the Internet, although if Stevens ultimately seeks to regulate any content over any wire, it could someday affect Internet content.
------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Transcript of Sen. Stevens' remarks on Internet "indecency"laws David Farber (Mar 16)