Interesting People mailing list archives
more on MIT says it won't admit hackers
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:13:32 -0500
------ Forwarded Message From: Marc <marcaniballi () hotmail com> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:56:30 -0500 To: <dave () farber net> Subject: RE: [IP] more on MIT says it won't admit hackers Dear Dave; It seems to me that regardless of the circumstances, American schools have enough problems already without cutting out some of their best prospective products! Most "hackers" regardless of their field, are very bright and highly skilled individuals who hold incredible potential for society as a whole. How many modern products (mainstream!) can be said to have been derived from a hacker mentality? Let's start with Apple and Blackberry and go from there. US schools are already slipping in the global rankings due to post 911 policy - telling hackers that they aren't welcome just means that those hackers won't come! And potentially worse, will have much less motivation to realise their potential within an American environment that obviously doesn't appreciate them. There are better ways of dealing with these issues; in a sense, the hacker provides a public service in exposing weakness. Obviously there should be legal consequences for malicious or harmful activity, but academic censure does nothing to abate the acts, and does a lot of damage to the institutions themselves. If I were presiding over an institution such as MIT, I would be encouraging hackers to play and report their findings - even give credits! Better an environment of play and co-opetition, than one of repression and significantly higher vulnerability. When hacking is outlawed, only outlaws will hack - and without hacking skills being encouraged and nurtured in our universities, where will the skills come from to protect us from the outlaws? Regards, Marc Aniballi -----Original Message----- From: owner-ip () v2 listbox com [mailto:owner-ip () v2 listbox com] On Behalf Of David Farber Sent: March 10, 2005 10:21 PM To: Ip Subject: [IP] more on MIT says it won't admit hackers ------ Forwarded Message From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:20:00 -0800 To: <dave () farber net> Cc: <lauren () vortex com> Subject: Re: [IP] MIT says it won't admit hackers Dave, I really need to write up something in more depth to justify my reasoning on this, but I believe these schools are grossly overreacting, in essence using those students as "whipping boys" to divert attention from the schools' own security problems. I'm certainly not an apologist for hackers, but in this case the students, using their own ID numbers, and only even potentially having access to information about their own cases (as I understand the situation currently), seem guilty in a moral sense primarily of those same elements of human nature that cause people to touch surfaces marked "wet paint" -- no obvious harmful attempt in this situation. This is what I call a "big red button" episode. If you mount a big red button on a wall that says "don't push me" -- a lot of completely honest and well-meaning folks are going to push it. That's human nature again. Yes, the students didn't show good sense in their actions. On the other hand, as a society we do a *terrible* job teaching youths about these issues (if we even bother to try), so much of the blame is our own. I strongly urge the educational institutions who are planning to reject applicants soley on the basis of this incident to reevaluate their decisions. This incident does not rise to the level that it should be capable of potentially ruining what otherwise might have been bright academic careers. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () pfir org or lauren () vortex com or lauren () privacyforum org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, Fact Squad - http://www.factsquad.org Co-Founder, URIICA - Union for Representative International Internet Cooperation and Analysis - http://www.uriica.org Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com DayThink: http://daythink.vortex.com - - -
------ Forwarded Message From: Monty Solomon <monty () roscom com> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:28:24 -0500 To: <undisclosed-recipient:;> Subject: MIT says it won't admit hackers MIT says it won't admit hackers Business school joins Harvard in decision By Robert Weisman, Globe Staff | March 9, 2005 The dean of MIT's Sloan School of Management yesterday said Sloan will join Harvard Business School in rejecting applications from prospective students who hacked into a website last week to learn whether they had been admitted before they were formally notified. Stanford's Graduate School of Business, meanwhile, asked its own applicant-hackers to come forward and explain their actions, in a sign that the California school soon may take tougher action as well. Thirty-two applicants apparently sought an early peek at the confidential data in their admission files at Sloan, while 41 files were targeted at Stanford and 119 at Harvard. Harvard on Monday became the second victimized business school to say outright it would not admit proven hackers. The first was Carnegie Mellon's Tepper School of Business, where one admission file was violated. Those schools, along with Dartmouth's Tuck School of Business and Duke's Fuqua School of Business, all use an independent website run by ApplyYourself Inc. of Fairfax, Va., to receive applications and, in some cases, manage communications with applicants. After midnight last Wednesday, hundreds of business school admission files were targeted by computers around the globe when a hacker posted detailed instructions on a BusinessWeek Online forum. Most of the hackers saw only blank screens, though some who accessed admission files at Harvard viewed preliminary decision information. ... http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2005/03/09/mit_says_it_wont_ad mit_ha ckers/ ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lauren () pfir org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as marcaniballi () hotmail com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on MIT says it won't admit hackers David Farber (Mar 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on MIT says it won't admit hackers David Farber (Mar 11)
- more on MIT says it won't admit hackers David Farber (Mar 11)
- more on MIT says it won't admit hackers Dave Farber (Mar 12)
- more on MIT says it won't admit hackers David Farber (Mar 13)