more on Why e-mail list operators might worry about Specter-Leahy data security bill

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com>
Date: June 30, 2005 1:56:51 PM EDT
To: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Cc: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com>, dave () farber net
Subject: Re: Why e-mail list operators might worry about Specter- 
Leahy data security bill



< NOT FOR IP >


> We already have a bunch of privacy torts on the books that are being
> used to sue Choicepoint etc. I'd like to see them being employed more
> aggressively.
> -Declan

I *definitely* agree that enacting new laws (that can muddy things up
rather than make them clearer) when existing laws aren't even being
used properly is very bad policy.  Politicians just love doing
new laws.

Another example of this is the laws against driving while talking
on handheld cell phones, even though the studies say handsfree
phones are just as dangerous, there are other distractions that
are as bad or worse, and most states already have laws that
can be applied against distracted or erratic driving.

--Lauren--



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/