more on Desecration of flag is crime amendment to constitution may pass both houses. Democrats afraid to oppose.

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Chris Beck <cbeck () pacanukeha net>
Date: June 15, 2005 11:09:17 PM EDT
To: dave () farber net, John Lyon <jelyon () mac com>
Subject: Re: [IP] more on Desecration of flag is crime amendment to  
constitution may pass both houses. Democrats afraid to oppose.


Rumour has it David Farber, on or about 15/06/2005 4:19 PM, whispered:


> Again, I ask: How can giving money to political entities be  
> politically
> protected speech, while burning the flag is not?]

Well it's obvious isn't it?  Einstein said it first: it's all relative.
"Protection" is relative to who is doing the protecting.  You are  
obviously
using some archaic definition of protected where it actually had a  
universal
application.

I await the videos eagerly.  May I suggest "Land of Hope & Glory" as  
the sound
track?  Preferrably a copyrighted version.

Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Beck  -  http://pacanukeha.blogspot.com
A small amount of power also corrupts absolutely


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/