Interesting People mailing list archives
more on loyalty oaths, in 2005
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:56:11 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: David Mercer <radix42 () gmail com> Date: July 27, 2005 9:48:55 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] loyalty oaths, in 2005 Reply-To: dmercer () u arizona edu Yes, other States do indeed have such requirement. I had to sign a loyalty oath with pretty much the same language to get a student job here in AZ this summer at my university. Here in AZ there is also additional language before the bit that appeared identical to the bit smb quoted in his email below that seemed inspired by anti-terrorist legislation, but as I was not provided a copy of what I signed (I never like that!) I can't reproduce it here. Cheers, David Mercer Tucson, AZ On 7/22/05, David Farber <dave () farber net> wrote:
You should have gone to UPenn or CMU djf Begin forwarded message: From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu> Date: July 21, 2005 10:01:59 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: loyalty oaths, in 2005 As many of you know, I comparatively recently joined the university faculty. There were many reasons for my move; one, of course, was thelure of academic freedom. Imagine my surprise when I received a letterinforming me that state law required me to sign a loyalty oath. You can find the full text in Section 3002, at http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?cl=30&a=75 . Here's the text I have to sign: I do hereby pledge and declare that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the State of New York, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the position of ..........................according to the best of my ability. This applies to any faculty member at any tax-exempt university in the state, private or public. Do other states have similar rules? How in the name of the First Amendment has this survived constitutional scrutiny? Lexis suggests challenges as late as 1971; lower courts affirmed the requirement, and the Supreme Court declined to hear the appeals. ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as radix42 () gmail com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ipArchives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on loyalty oaths, in 2005 David Farber (Jul 28)