Interesting People mailing list archives
FCC's continuing deceptions... a point of view
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:50:13 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Frank Muto <info () ISPNETWORKS ORG> Date: July 20, 2005 11:35:29 AM EDT To: CYBERTELECOM-L () LISTSERV AOL COM Subject: FCC's continuing deceptions... a point of viewReply-To: Telecom Regulation & the Internet <CYBERTELECOM- L () LISTSERV AOL COM>
NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: GIBBS & BRADNER 07/19/05 Today's focus: Continuing deceptions By Scott BradnerThe FCC just released the fifth annual report on the status of "High- Speed
Services for Internet Access" in the U.S. and its possessions (<http://www.networkworld.com/nlgibrad3411> ). Like its predecessors, this
report is fundamentally misleading on a number of fronts.The FCC produced this report and its predecessors because Section 706 of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 ( <http://www.fcc.gov/telecom.html> )directed the FCC to regularly "initiate a notice of inquiry concerning the availability of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans" and
from the results of the inquiry determine "whether advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion."If the answer is ever no, the FCC is required to "take immediate action to
accelerate deployment of such capability." The Act defined "advanced telecommunications capability" as "high-speed, switched, broadbandtelecommunications capability that enables users to originate and receive high-quality voice, data, graphics, and video telecommunications using any
technology."I have no idea what Congress in all of its technical prowess thought it was talking about when it mentioned high-speed broadband in the Telecom Act but all the network people that I know would not consider any service of less
than 1M bit/sec as a "high-speed, switched, broadband telecommunications capability."In the first of its reports (<http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/ 706.html> ) the FCC used the term "broadband," but it arbitrarily defined this as a service
supporting at least 200K bit/sec in both directions.Maybe because it became clear that few observers agreed with its use of the term broadband to mean such a slow service, and maybe because the numbers were not going to be all that impressive, the FCC has now dropped the term and substituted "high-speed," which it defines as at least 200K bit/ sec, but
it only has to be in one direction -thereby halving its already low requirement. This is misleading at best.It seems like the FCC has been able to confuse (deceive?) some in the press who touted the growth in broadband usage based on the FCC report. It also seems to have confused the FCC chairman, who published an editorial in the July 7Wall Street Journaltouting the growth of broadband deployment in the
U.S.Maybe no one told him that the FCC's own survey just reported on high- speed,
not broadband, access. As I mentioned two years ago, which was the last time I looked at one of these reports, ("Reading into the FCC's 'Net access stats,"<http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2003/0623bradner.html>), there are a
lot of other problems with the FCC's approach. For example, its very misleading assumption that a single subscriber to high-speed services in a ZIP code can tell you anything about the actualavailability of high-speed (never mind actual broadband) service to people
living in that ZIP code.All of the statistics in the FCC report are "up and to the right" and thus
look good. It's too bad that it actually does not tell us all that muchabout Internet service that can actually be used for "high-quality voice, data, graphics, and video telecommunications." Maybe someday we will find
out but maybe not from the FCC.Disclaimer: Most of Harvard's stats are also up and to the right, but I've seen no university opinion on the FCC's use of such stats so the above is my
own rant. Bradner is a consultant with Harvard University's University Information Systems. He can be reached at <mailto:sob () sobco com>. _______________________________________________________________ To contact: Scott Bradner Bradner is a consultant with Harvard University's University Information Systems. He can be reached at <mailto:sob () sobco com> Frank Muto Co-founder - Washington Bureau for ISP Advocacy - WBIA Telecom Summit Ad Hoc Committee http://gigabytemarch.blog.com/ www.wbia.us ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- FCC's continuing deceptions... a point of view David Farber (Jul 20)