ip lurker bullies

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

I have been so "bullied" but I fight back djf


Begin forwarded message:

From: Jordan Pollack <pollack () cs brandeis edu>
Date: December 31, 2005 3:01:12 PM EST
To: mary.shaw () cs cmu edu
Cc: dave () farber net
Subject: ip lurker bullies

Hi Mary,

Sorry to see you bullied. I've seen this exact kind of off-list email  
mind-control bullying repeatedly over several years on Jewish mailing  
lists and bulletin boards. If you spoke up against any israeli  
policy, say, the murder of Rachel Corrie, or the assassination of  
Sheik Yassin, the illegal expropriation of land, the destruction of  
olive groves and construction of a illegal border wall, etc.,  you  
became subject to a barrage of hateful email from angry and anonymous  
ultra-right-wing jews suggesting that you are a towel-head lover,  
that you should invite al quada  terrorists into your house to rape  
your daughter. you could even get  added to the self-hating-jew hit  
list  http://www.masada2000.org/shit-list.html

Its good that you exposed this, but I wonder how many other people on  
IP are getting bullied by lurking trolls and not exposing it. Dave,  
it may be worth asking people if they have received similar  
nastygrams for items posted.

Jordan


David Farber wrote:

> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Mary Shaw <mary.shaw () cs cmu edu>
> Date: December 31, 2005 1:57:10 PM EST
> To: JoeyEM () aol com
> Cc: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
> Subject: Re: [IP] AP Story Justice Dept. Probing Domestic Spying Leak
>
> Joe,
>
> You appear to be saying that it's treasonous to expose illegal  
> acts  by the
> government if those acts are carried out under the cloak of   
> protecting us
> from our enemies.
>
>  There seems to be something fundamentally broken about your model   
> -- it has
> no way to curtail illegal activities by the government.  The checks  
> and
> balances  provided for in the Constitution can't operate in this   
> atmosphere,
> and the Constitution is what the government is supposed to be  
> defending.
>
> The argument that the ends justify the means has long been suspect.
>
> Mary
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <JoeyEM () aol com>
> To: <mary.shaw () cs cmu edu>
> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 12:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [IP] AP Story Justice Dept. Probing Domestic Spying Leak
>
>
> You ask why Mary??  How about treason!  Traitors who have  disclosed
> information about an effective means with which to capture and destroy
> enemies of the
> US.
>
> Mary, in case you didn't know, Muslims are out there who want to   
> kill  you.
> I know it's hard for Liberals to accept this basis  truth, but if  
> you  don't
> accept the fact that we are at war and that the NY  Times and  
> Washington
> Post
> are more interested in protecting the rights of our  enemies than   
> your life
> you
> better order your burka outfit as you may soon be  required to wear  
> one.
>
> And yes Mary, the NYT and WP are traitorous.
>
> Joe Mersnik
>
>
>
>
> From: Mary Shaw <mary.shaw () cs cmu edu>
> Date: December 30, 2005  12:26:18 PM EST
> To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
> Subject: AP Story  Justice Dept. Probing Domestic Spying Leak
>
> Dave,
>
> Why is the  Justice Dept probing the leak rather than the domestic
> spying program  itself?  Or did I miss the announcement of the latter?
>
> Excerpted  from  http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&u=/ap/
> 20051230/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/domestic_spying_probe_6
>
> Mary
>
> ============================
>
> Justice  Dept. Probing Domestic Spying Leak
>
> By TONI LOCY, Associated Press  Writer
>
> The Justice Department has opened an investigation into the leak  of
> classified information about President Bush's secret domestic  spying
> program, Justice officials said Friday.
>
> The officials,  who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of
> the probe, said  the inquiry will focus on disclosures to The New York
> Times about  warrantless surveillance conducted by the National
> Security Agency  since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
>
> [[[snip]]]
>
> Revelation of the  secret spying program unleashed a firestorm of
> criticism of the  administration. Some critics accused the president
> of breaking the law  by authorizing intercepts of conversations
> without prior court  approval or oversight  of people inside the
> United States and abroad  who had suspected ties to al-Qaida or its
> affiliates.
>
> [[[snip]]]
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------
> You are subscribed as pollack () cs brandeis edu
> To manage your subscription, go to
>  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
>
> Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- 
> people/



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/