Interesting People mailing list archives
Jury hears technical details of Microsoft patent infringement case
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:54:34 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Timothy Barmann <tbarmann () projo com> Date: September 16, 2004 8:48:50 AM EDT To: David Farber <dave () farber net>Subject: Jury hears technical details of Microsoft patent infringement case
Hi Dave, Thought IPers might find this interesting ... Tim Barmann --Timothy Barmann Technology Writer The Providence Journal http://www.projo.com/business/content/projo_20040916_16ms16.2cec80.html PC jargon dominates patent trialA Providence jury hears all about the "Smart Tag" technology at the center
of the lawsuit filed against Microsoft. 01:00 AM EDT on Thursday, September 16, 2004 BY TIMOTHY C. BARMANN Journal Staff Writer PROVIDENCE -- Jurors for the Microsoft patent-lawsuit trial in U.S. District Court got an earful of computer jargon yesterday.They heard lawyers and an expert witness bandy about arcane terms such as
"compiler," "source code" and "dynamic-link libraries."The four-man, four-woman panel is being asked to decide whether Microsoft
Corp.'s popular line of Office products, including Word and Excel, infringe on a patent held by a small, Cayman Islands software company. Arendi AS and its Providence-based subsidiary, Arendi USA, contend that Microsoft's "Smart Tag" technology infringes on Arendi's patent number 6,323,853, issued three years ago. .... Jurors had to sit through a wide range of testimony -- from the basic to the highly technical. David Klausner, a computer consultant hired by Arendi, said he had examined several Microsoft Office products, as well as the computer programming instructions used to make them, and concluded that they infringed on seven aspects of Arendi's patent. In getting to that conclusion, his testimony sounded like a brief lessonin computer science. It included the obvious, such as what a CD-ROM looks
like. But it also contained highly technical explanations, such as how one can write a customized Smart Tag DLL using certain programming tools. The jury appeared attentive throughout the testimony, often bendingforward in their seats to view evidence presented on flat-screen monitors
in the jury box. ... ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Jury hears technical details of Microsoft patent infringement case David Farber (Sep 16)