Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Army Times calls for Rumsfeld and Meyers relief
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 18:46:12 -0400
Delivered-To: dfarber+ () ux13 sp cs cmu edu Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 15:40:42 -0700 From: Norman MacLeod <gaelwolf () waypt com> Subject: RE: [IP] Fwd: Army Times calls for Rumsfeld and Meyers relief To: dave () farber net Dave - The officer reprimands that have been given out already are only a preliminary step and don't mean that those reprimanded are free from additional charges being laid at a later date. Reprimands require far less complete investigation than full courts martial in most cases. There are at least seven full investigations still open, and charges can be expected to flow from them as they wrap up. We won't, however, be haring as much as we like prior to the event...there's this concept knows as "command influence" in which commanders can't let their outcome preferences be known prior to trial. That prevents the courts martial from leaning in the commander's direction on either verdict or sentence. If command influence can be shown on appeal, punishments can be severely reduced or entirely set aside. One investigation that's going to provide an interesting sidelight is the one that determines how the media obtained the Taguba report before the top echelon of command (SecDef, JCS, etc.) did. It's not just that the leak was damaging in the public relations respect, but more that it likely screwed up the quality and completeness of at least some of the other investigations that are not yet anywhere close to maturity in terms of unearthing those at fault in command positions. Not only is blindsiding the Pentagon not a real good idea for someone who wants a career to last to retirement and pension, but it allows those being investigated an inappropriate opportunity to at least partially cover their tracks. Hammers need to fall in more than one direction. Those who are being charged and tried now may be at the lower levels of the food chain...but the most damning evidence for their trials (photos and videos) is much easier to evaluate than all the paper chase and witness statement gathering that's going to be required to build solid cases against people further up the chain who do not appear in any of the photos or videos. If you really want to see those up the chain adequately disciplined for their misdeeds, you need to be patient enough to allow the investigations to be iron-clad before charges are laid. Haste at this point means that people will get away with things that they shouldn't. Norman MacLeod -----Original Message----- From: owner-ip () v2 listbox com [mailto:owner-ip () v2 listbox com] On Behalf Of Dave Farber Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 3:02 PM To: ip () v2 listbox com Subject: [IP] Fwd: Army Times calls for Rumsfeld and Meyers relief [ the thing that amazes me is that the press does not find it strange that the officers are given reprimands and the enlisted reservist are taken to court. Where is the military traditions and law?? Dave ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Army Times calls for Rumsfeld and Meyers relief Dave Farber (May 10)