Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Who's afraid of digital voting? Jim Lucier points to John Fund article...
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 09:14:33 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Ed Gerck <egerck () nma com> Date: July 31, 2004 3:43:39 AM EDT To: dave () farber net Cc: Ip <ip () v2 listbox com>Subject: Re: [IP] Who's afraid of digital voting? Jim Lucier points to John Fund article...
David Farber wrote:
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: For Politech--Who's afraid of digital voting? Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:45:28 -0400 From: James Lucier For a long time I have wondered how anyone who believes that properly constructed, authenticated, and encrypted paperless transactions can be safer and more secure than paper based transactions by any reasonable standard can buy into the theory that digital balloting can never work unless it achieves some impossible degree of perfection.
This is a commom misconception. Voting is not a banking transaction. For example, contrary to banking, a ballot (ie, a transaction in bank terms) must be not be linkable to whoever did it. This is an absolute requirement for public elections in the US (that must not be broken even under court order) and is specially hard to guarantee because voters are not anonymous (they have to be well-identified) to begin with. Further, a voter should not be able to prove, not even to himself, how he voted. Compare this with banking: if there is a debit of $10,000.00 in our account, how would you feel if no one (not even you) could prove that the debit is not yours? Clearly, the transactions operate under very different premises in elections versus banking. Also, banks are willing to accept a certain amount of fraud inherent in their business because, on average, loss is covered by insurance. However, one cannot accept an average level of 1% of fraud when conducting an election. Also, insurance is not an acceptable mechanism for dealing with fraud in elections. One cannot socialize the cost of fraud in elections. Regards, Ed Gerck ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Who's afraid of digital voting? Jim Lucier points to John Fund article... David Farber (Jul 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on Who's afraid of digital voting? Jim Lucier points to John Fund article... David Farber (Jul 31)