Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Outsourcing to India: All that glitters, or even glisters, is not gold
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:15:30 -0500
Delivered-To: dfarber+ () ux13 sp cs cmu edu Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:08:00 -0500 From: Marc Aniballi <marcaniballi () hotmail com> Subject: RE: [IP] more on Outsourcing to India: All that glitters, or even glisters, is not gold X-Originating-IP: [81.48.76.22] X-Sender: marcaniballi () hotmail com To: stevecoh1 () comcast net Cc: dave () farber net Excellent points Steve!! In retrospect, I regret (to a degree) my use of the word "monkey." But in my world (maybe not in yours) we have a distinction between the programmer's equivalent of a secretary and someone who can create and innovate with the milieu of programming. Outsourcing of software development to more "cost effective" regions does not replace the need for the Software Engineer. It simply reduces the amount of assembly line/administrative programming that engineer is required to do. Programming IMHO is NOT a profession, it is a skill, like arc welding. DESIGNING software is a profession, like engineering. Skills are things that need to be done, and done well, but that are trainable. To the degree that almost ANYONE can be TRAINED to perform the skill to an adequate level of quality. This is true of programming. DESIGNING programs and systems however, is MUCH less trivial, requires broad understanding beyond the programming language structures, requires creativity, risk assessment and management skills, etc. While monkey was a bad choice of slang for the IP forum, it is not an uncommon term used to refer to programmers who are incapable, or are limited from, inserting any initiative/creativity into their work - They simply follow instructions and crank out perfect code to the specification (Make sure the spec is right!!). While a useful function, the individual's role is no more important to a project or an organization than a secretary's was in the 70's. They are easily replaceable from a large pool of skilled labor. This is NOT the case of a software engineer, architect or project manager. That pool is MUCH smaller, and there is a fairly large spread in the relative quality of service available. It is VERY hard to change engineers or architects in mid project without costing yourself a small fortune in transfer time and effort. So I guess my point has been and will remain, that a global marketplace is the logical result of the WTO activities (driven by America as much as anyone). Once we have a global marketplace, then there will be a global market for skilled (and unskilled) labor. That labor will chase the best pay (probably globally), and the organizations requiring labor will seek it in the least expensive places. This has been and will continue to be the case in a world that subscribes to the scarcity myth and also believes that some higher being gave them this planet to do with as they please. What had always been the case in the early history of America, was that it was ENOUGH to make it in the US and sell it in the US to get rich. As soon as multinationals started expanding, they didn't bring more jobs to American factory workers! They built NEW factories overseas! Because it was more cost effective to produce near your customers than to ship it to them. Then along came automated assembly lines and suddenly there was a glut in unskilled labor! Unskilled because their skill was obsolete. But let's be realistic, they were never Professionals! You Steve, may or may not be a "code monkey" it depends on what you do everyday. If it is, "Sit in front of a computer and program to a set spec with no input to design or method and only focused on sticking to the specification and writing bug free code." Then you fit the model. THAT is a code monkey. If however, programming is only 40 - 50% of your week and the rest is in design meetings, code reviews, architecture reviews, change management, etc. Then you are a Professional, you are NOT a programmer, you are at least an Analyst, if not an Architect/Engineer or more. This is a role that is VERY hard to outsource, because it blends intimate knowledge of the technology with intimate knowledge of the business and marketplace. Something your average Indian graduate/programmer will have a hard time competing with in an outsourcing paradigm. You seemed a little P.O.ed in your email, I'm sorry if I upset you, my intention was to point out a different perspective on the outsourcing issue. As with many on this side of the pond, we wonder how the US can condemn IBM, Microsoft and other anti-trust defendants for trying to protect their markets aggressively, and yet act in a similar manner as those defendants within the world community in areas like agriculture, steel, skilled labor, etc. I am glad Dave published your rebuttal - It will hopefully get people thinking a little more deeply about the whole situation. As to your barb at the end - The world (and America) needs Aniballi's as much as it needs Cohen's and even Farber's (to make sure we have a platform to communicate!!). I have had 5 "Careers" in my life (so far) and while the changes where to a degree "Gut wrenching" I enjoy the voyage, that's me! The internet bubble cannot be blamed on the idea guys running amok! The idea guys still exist today, in equal or possibly greater numbers. Today, though, they are not being chased by crazed VCs and Andersen Consultants. It was a much the Cohen's of the world as anyone who created and supported the bubble through their participation in the market mania (either directly or through aggressive mutual funds/401ks). It was every Joe out there who bought into the idea that all these kids with ideas were likely to be the next Bill Gates' of the world. So while the prominence of ideas is suffering the backlash of a public, who "lost" a bucket load of cash in the bubble, it has not vanished, in fact in Asia and Europe, there is a renaissance in start-ups occurring. A renaissance that is fiscally responsible - find a market, get some cash flow, THEN seek funding - at a reasonable and manageable level. You don't here about these guys in the news everyday, and that's a good thing. They at least have the chance to succeed without their failures being broadcast to the world in realtime! Everyday that I read IP I thank Her for the incredible diversity of opinion in the membership and the opportunity to enter into edifying discussions with people that have a similar love of the exploration of ideas. Regards, Marc Aniballi -----Original Message----- From: owner-ip () v2 listbox com [mailto:owner-ip () v2 listbox com] On Behalf Of Dave Farber Sent: February 14, 2004 8:17 AM To: ip () v2 listbox com Subject: [IP] more on Outsourcing to India: All that glitters, or even glisters, is not gold From: Steve Cohen <stevecoh1 () comcast net> To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] more on Outsourcing to India: All that glitters, or even glisters, is not gold Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:51:04 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Dave, For a Chief Technology Officer like Mr. Anniballi to refer to his employees as "monkeys" is totally outrageous. I am so tired of hearing my profession and skill denigrated by free-trade ideologues. I am not a "code monkey" and neither are the offshore workers to whom jobs are flowing. I am a skilled professional. I produce quality work, which is more than I can say for some of the dreamers who Mr. Aniballi finds so interesting. No country can survive on innovation alone. America's greatness was not built on innovation alone. You also have to be able to execute on that innovation. That's where engineering comes in. Haven't we just witnessed a boom in which "creative types" dreamed up all sorts of insane ways of throwing money out the window pursuing Internet dreams? Are Americans really ready adopt a lifestyle that includes as its norm three or four gut-wrenching career changes in a lifetime? That is what the Aniballis of the world are rushing us toward. It should surprise no one that a backlash is forming against this. ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as marcaniballi () hotmail com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ipArchives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Outsourcing to India: All that glitters, or even glisters, is not gold Dave Farber (Feb 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on Outsourcing to India: All that glitters, or even glisters, is not gold Dave Farber (Feb 14)
- more on Outsourcing to India: All that glitters, or even glisters, is not gold Dave Farber (Feb 15)
- more on Outsourcing to India: All that glitters, or even glisters, is not gold Dave Farber (Feb 15)