Interesting People mailing list archives
Congress leveraging Superbowl incident into mass content controls
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:42:09 -0500
Delivered-To: dfarber+ () ux13 sp cs cmu edu Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:01:09 -0800 (PST) From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> Subject: Congress leveraging Superbowl incident into mass content controls To: dave () farber net Dave, It is now utterly apparent that there are those in the administration and Congress attempting to use the recent Superbowl "incident" as an excuse for massive controls over all forms of TV and radio -- including cable and satellite (the Internet they've already been attacking with laws currently before the courts, of course). While the so-called "wardrobe malfunction" certainly qualified as tasteless and crude during the Superbowl, the appearance of a single mammary gland seems hardly more dangerous to the minds of the kiddies than the spectacle of many violent sports (football, boxing, et al.) themselves. Now the powers-that-be see an opening to impose a narrow-minded agenda on broadcasters of almost every ilk, and in the super-concentrated world of the conglomerates the effects could lead to panicky self-censorship on a grand scale by the broadcasting behemoths. Some of the new "indecency" measures being proposed in Congress: - massive increases in maximum fines - making networks pay 90% of affiliate violation fines - basing fines on the wealth of the broadcaster, e.g. allow a *single* fine to reach 10% of a station's yearly revenue - extending indecency bans to cover "gratuitous violence that is detrimental to the health and safety of children" - extending indecency bans to *all* forms of TV and radio, including broadcast, satellite, and cable - allow license revocations to occur after three indecency violations and on and on, with both Democrats and Republicans spewing forth various draconian content-control gems of dubious constitutionality. I'm not an apologist for obscenity or the other garbage that makes up so much of today's broadcasting scene. But I am very concerned to see Congress in the process of pandering to those who would happily reestablish the Hayes Office (look it up, kids!) -- and worse -- if they could. Given the range of violent and horrible atrocities taking place in the world today, and the untold millions of people in desperate need, that Congress has time to spend on trying to make TV, radio, and the Internet "safe" for the lowest common denominator is in itself obscene. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () pfir org or lauren () vortex com or lauren () privacyforum org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, Fact Squad - http://www.factsquad.org Co-Founder, URIICA - Union for Representative International Internet Cooperation and Analysis - http://www.uriica.org Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.comMember, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Congress leveraging Superbowl incident into mass content controls Dave Farber (Feb 13)