Interesting People mailing list archives
Big Screens for Less, Though Not Little
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:21:35 -0500
Big Screens for Less, Though Not Little March 13, 2003 By DAVID POGUE CAUTION: The following column contains subject matter for mature audiences with self-restraint. It includes references to plasma television screens, which in susceptible individuals may induce dizziness, palpitations and shortness of breath. Do not attempt to drive or operate heavy machinery after reading this column. After all, plasma television sets are the ultimate status symbol of the moment. They offer three features that drive people crazy with desire. First, they're big, shiny, flat, sleek, thin, futuristic and - to use the technical term - wicked cool. Second, they are rectangular, like a movie screen. When you watch a movie on DVD, you don't have to endure the existential angst of knowing that you're missing 25 percent of the frame, as you do on a conventional square television. Finally, plasma sets are generally insanely expensive - $7,000 for a 42-incher, for example - which only makes them more desirable. So if somebody offered to sell you a brand-new 42-inch plasma screen for $3,000, you'd probably assume that it had, ahem, fallen off a truck. But Gateway has been offering exactly that deal since November (in Gateway stores or from www.gateway .com), and now a new company called V Inc. offers a 46-inch model called the Vizio P4 for $4,000 (www.vinc.us). The price doesn't include shipping and in-home setup, which costs another $300 or so. (If you're a home-entertainment do-it-yourselfer, you can pay $160 for Gateway's delivery-only plan.) Each price does, however, include a table stand, which comes in handy - plasmas lose much of their status-symbol status when they're just propped against a wall. These sets are every bit as gorgeous as their pricier predecessors. Each is less than four inches thick. Speakers are built in but are feeble, evidently on the premise that after dropping four grand on a screen, most people will spend a few hundred more on a decent sound system. <snip> And besides, an EDTV plasma is still capable of sending you to couch-potato nirvana when you play a DVD. By happy coincidence, an enhanced-definition set precisely matches the resolution of DVD movies: 480 lines of resolution. (Superb though their picture quality may be, DVD's aren't high-definition.) A wide-screen plasma and a wide-screen DVD movie, especially when played on a so-called progressive-scan player, are a match made in heaven, a real movie theater in your home. High-definition material looks great, too; despite the slightly inferior resolution, EDTV plasmas reproduce the more brilliant color palette of high-definition shows. Gateway's sets have been a runaway success; at the moment, there is a monthlong wait to get one. Furthermore, they have spawned a brood of imitators: you will soon be able to buy $3,000 42-inch, enhanced-definition plasmas from Samsung, Apex and others. (V also sells a 32-inch model for $3,000.) Clearly, Gateway and its imitators have stumbled onto a brilliant revelation: for thousands of consumers, the primary appeal of plasma screens isn't the picture, but the bigness, flatness and coolness. Gateway has pioneered the concept of selling you the part you care about at half the price, positioning itself as the Southwest Airlines of the home-entertainment industry. As you contemplate the $4,000 you have saved, you may momentarily rue the fact that you will never be able to see the full, spectacular resolution of high definition when it comes along. This moment of depression may return to you in two years, when true HDTV plasmas will probably cost less than $3,000. But even now, enhanced-definition plasmas offer a certain economy. If you are having trouble justifying the purchase to your spouse, pull out a calculator. Point out that if the two of you start watching films at home instead of going out to the movies once a month, your thin, sleek, incredibly cool plasma screen will pay for itself - in only 14 years. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/13/technology/circuits/13stat.html?ex=1048763 408&ei=1&en=795dfc6f480eddba HOW TO ADVERTISE --------------------------------- For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or other creative advertising opportunities with The New York Times on the Web, please contact onlinesales () nytimes com or visit our online media kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo For general information about NYTimes.com, write to help () nytimes com. Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Big Screens for Less, Though Not Little Dave Farber (Mar 15)