SF Chron: Firm linked to Cheney wils oil-field contract

[Dave Farber <dave () farber net>]

------ Forwarded Message
From: Paul Saffo <psaffo () iftf org>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 16:35:14 -0800
To: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Cc: Paul Saffo <psaffo () iftf org>, Richard Sergay <Richard.G.Sergay () abc com>
Subject: SF Chron: Firm linked to Cheney wils oil-field contract

An interesting read...


------------------
Firm linked to Cheney wins oil-field contract
Hussein may destroy facilities in event of war
-Edward Epstein, Chronicle Washington Bureau
       Saturday, March 8, 2003
       ©2003 San Francisco Chronicle | Feedback

URL: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/03/08/MN242495.DTL

       Washington -- A company tied to Vice President Dick Cheney has won a
Pentagon contract for advice on rebuilding Iraq's oil fields after a
possible war. 

       The contract was disclosed in the last paragraph of a Defense
Department statement on preparations for Saddam Hussein's possible
destruction of Iraq's oil fields in the event of a U.S.-led invasion. The
statement calls for proposals on how to handle oil well fires and for
assessing other damage to oil facilities. The contract went to Kellogg Brown
& Root Services, which is owned by Halliburton Co., of which Cheney was
chairman until his election in 2000.

       The Houston company is a respected name in petroleum industry
construction and one of a few companies capable of large-scale oil field
reconstruction. But its ties to Cheney arouse suspicions among those who
believe that a primary motive for a U.S. war in Iraq is oil.

       "I certainly don't think this comes as much of a surprise," said
Michael Renner, a researcher at WorldWatch Institute, commenting on the
Halliburton contract,  "There are lots of business opportunities embedded in
this war. It represents the larger oil and energy issues at stake."

       The White House wouldn't comment on how the contract might fuel such
suspicions. "I deal with the reality of situations," said spokesman Ken
Lisaius. "The  president has made it abundantly clear about the threat that
Saddam Hussein poses to us and our friends. We stand by to help rebuild a
liberated Iraq." 

       NO COMMENT FROM CHENEY

       Cheney's office declined comment, but a Halliburton spokeswoman told
the Wall Street Journal that Kellogg Brown & Root has been doing government
contracting since the 1940s. The Pentagon wouldn't discuss the exact size of
the contract, nor how it was rewarded, saying the information is classified.

       The initial Kellogg Brown & Root contract doesn't mean it has an
inside track on later contracts potentially totaling billions of dollars to
rehabilitate Iraq's oil fields, explore new ones and pump the increased
supply. 

       Even if they emerge unscathed, Iraq's oil fields will need work
performed by companies like Kellogg Brown & Root. Daily production has
slumped during the past two decades, worn down by wars and, since 1991, by
United Nations sanctions that barred imports of equipment. Daily output
capacity is about 2 million barrels, down from 3.5 million barrels before
Hussein took power in 1979.

       With enough investment, it's thought Iraqi production could surge to
10 million to 12 million barrels a day within a decade.

       Iraq's proven oil reserves of 112 billion barrels are the world's
second- largest behind only Saudi Arabia. And there might be large untapped
fields in Iraq ripe for exploration.

       Renner is convinced that U.S. multinational oil industry firms would
strike it rich in post-war Iraq. "Regime change in Baghdad would reshuffle
the cards and give U.S. (and British) companies a good shot at direct access
to Iraqi oil fields for the first time in 30 years -- a windfall worth
hundreds of billions of dollars," he said.

       Administration supporters say past history refutes claims that a war
with Iraq is about oil.

       "This bumper sticker mentality about oil was wrong in the 1991 Gulf
War, and it's wrong now. We gave the oil back to Kuwait back then, and this
war, at root, is about the nature of Saddam Hussein's regime," said James
Phillips, foreign policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation.

       REBUILDING TOOL

       Administration officials have said they view Iraq's petroleum wealth
as a tool for rebuilding. "Iraq's natural resources belong to all the Iraqi
people and -- after decades of being used to build palaces and weapons of
mass destruction -- will finally be used for their benefit, not Hussein's,"
wrote deputy national security adviser Steve Hadley in a recent op-ed
article in the Washington Post.

       In saying that, the White House is following international law, said
David Caron, a professor at UC Berkeley's Boalt Hall School of Law. Under
the 1907 Hague  Convention, the United States would be present in Iraq as an
occupying power and would hold the country's resources in trust.

       It could rebuild Iraq's oil infrastructure, but probably would have
to recognize contracts that oil companies from France, China and Russia have
signed with Hussein's regime, even though their governments oppose a war.

       "I don't think the United States would get into breaching contracts,
but there would be room for new contracts to be let," Caron said.

       Using an open bidding process that wouldn't favor American firms
"would be wise politically," he added.

       EXPERIENCE IN KUWAIT

       In San Francisco, anti-war activists have accused the Bechtel Corp.,
the engineering firm that rebuilt Kuwait's oil fields after Hussein
destroyed them in the 1991 Gulf War, of waiting to profit from a new
conflict. Bechtel officials discount that assertion as nonsense.

       Spokesman Jonathan Marshall said that while the company is proud of
the work it did rebuilding Kuwait's fields, "Bechtel has never lobbied to
create a political crisis there. We're not even at war yet, so it's
premature to speculate."

       But Marshall added that "I'm sure the United States government will
consider Bechtel if there is work to be done."

       A report by the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at
Rice University, a think tank created by the former secretary of state to
the first President George Bush, warns the current administration not to
show favoritism for American firms in rebuilding Iraq's oil industry.

       "There should be a level playing field for all international players
to participate in future repair, development and exploration efforts," the
report said. "A heavy-handed American approach will only convince them (the
Iraqis) . . . and the rest of the world that the operation against Iraq was
undertaken for imperialist,  rather than disarmament, reasons."

       E-mail Edward Epstein at eepstein () sfchronicle com.

       ©2003 San Francisco Chronicle | Feedback

         Page A - 12



------ End of Forwarded Message

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To manage your subscription, go to
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/