Interesting People mailing list archives

"Music-Sharing Subpoenas Target Parents"


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:16:33 -0400


Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:35:41 -0400
From: Ted Bridis <tbridis () ap org>
Subject: "Music-Sharing Subpoenas Target Parents"
To: dave () farber net


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38406-2003Jul24.html

By TED BRIDIS
AP Technology Writer

WASHINGTON - Parents, roommates - even grandparents - are being targeted in
the music industry's new campaign to track computer users who share songs
over the Internet, bringing the threat of expensive lawsuits to more than
college kids.

"Within five minutes, if I can get hold of her, this will come to an end,"
said Gordon Pate of Dana Point, Calif., when told by The Associated Press
that a federal subpeona had been issued over his daughter's music downloads.
The subpoena required the family's Internet provider to hand over Pate's
name and address to lawyers for the recording industry.

Pate, 67, confirmed that his 23-year-old daughter, Leah Pate, had installed
file-sharing software using an account cited on the subpoena. But he said
his daughter would stop immediately and the family didn't know using such
software could result in a stern warning, expensive lawsuit or even criminal
prosecution.

"There's no way either us or our daughter would do anything we knew to be
illegal," Pate said, promising to remove the software quickly. "I don't
think anybody knew this was illegal, just a way to get some music."

The president of the Recording Industry Association of America, the trade
group for the largest music labels, warned that lawyers will pursue
downloaders regardless of personal circumstances because it would deter
other Internet users.

"The idea really is not to be selective, to let people know that if they're
offering a substantial number of files for others to copy, they are at
risk," Cary Sherman said. "It doesn't matter who they are."

Over the coming months this may be the Internet's equivalent of shock and
awe, the stunning discovery by music fans across America that copyright
lawyers can pierce the presumed anonymity of file-sharing, even for computer
users hiding behind clever nicknames such as "hottdude0587" or
"bluemonkey13."

In Charleston, W.Va., college student Amy Boggs said she quickly deleted
more than 1,400 music files on her computer after the AP told her she was
the target of another subpoena. Boggs said she sometimes downloaded dozens
of songs on any given day, including ones by Fleetwood Mac, Blondie, Incubus
and Busta Rhymes.

Since Boggs used her roommates' Internet account, the roommates' name and
address was being turned over to music industry lawyers.

"This scares me so bad I never want to download anything again," said Boggs,
who turned 22 on Thursday. "I never thought this would happen. There are
millions of people out there doing this."

In homes where parents or grandparents may not closely monitor the family's
Internet use, news could be especially surprising. A defendant's liability
can depend on their age and whether anyone else knew about the music
downloads.

Bob Barnes, a 50-year-old grandfather in Fresno, Calif., and the target of
another subpeona, acknowledged sharing "several hundred" music files. He
said he used the Internet to download hard-to-find recordings of European
artists because he was unsatisfied with modern American artists and grew
tired of buying CDs without the chance to listen to them first.

"If you don't like it, you can't take it back," said Barnes, who runs a
small video production company with his wife from their three-bedroom home.
"You have all your little blonde, blue-eyed clones. There's no originality."


Citing on its subpoenas the numeric Internet addresses of music downloaders,
the RIAA has said it can only track users by comparing those addresses
against subscriber records held by Internet providers. But the AP used those
addresses and other details culled from subpoenas and was able to identify
and locate some Internet users who are among the music industry's earliest
targets.

Pate was wavering whether to call the RIAA to negotiate a settlement.
"Should I call a lawyer?" he wondered.

The RIAA's president wasn't sure what advice to offer because he never
imagined downloaders could be identified by name until Internet providers
turned over subscriber records.

"It's not a scenario we had truthfully envisaged," Sherman said. "If
somebody wants to settle before a lawsuit is filed it would be fine to call
us, but it's really not clear how we're going to perceive this."

The RIAA has issued at least 911 subpoenas so far, according to court
records. Lawyers have said they expect to file at least several hundred
lawsuits within eight weeks, and copyright laws allow for damages of $750 to
$150,000 for each song.

The AP tracked targets of subpoenas to neighborhoods in Boston; Chicago; St.
Louis; San Francisco; New York and Ann Arbor, Mich.

Outside legal experts urged the music industry to carefully select targets
for its earliest lawsuits. Several lawyers said they were doubtful the RIAA
ultimately will choose to sue computer users like the Pate family.

"If they end up picking on individuals who are perceived to be grandmothers
or junior high students who have only downloaded in isolated incidents, they
run the risk of a backlash," said Christopher Caldwell, a lawyer in Los
Angeles who works with major studios and the Motion Picture Association of
America.

The recording industry said Pate's daughter was offering songs by Billy
Idol, Missy Elliot, Duran Duran, Def Leppard and other artists. Pate said
that he never personally downloaded music and that he so zealously respects
copyrights that he doesn't videotape movies off cable television channels.

Barnes, who used the Napster (news - web sites) service until the music
industry shut it down, said he rarely uses file-sharing software these days
unless his grandson visits. The RIAA found songs on his computer by Marvin
Gaye, Savage Garden, Berlin, the Eagles, Dire Straits and others.

Barnes expressed some concern about a possible lawsuit but was confident
that "more likely they will probably come out with a cease and desist order"
to stop him sharing music files on the Internet.

"I think they're trying to scare people," Barnes said.
___

On the Net:
Recording Industry Association of America: www.riaa.org
Subpoena Defense: www.subpoenadefense.org

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: