Interesting People mailing list archives
more on a rant from your Editor on the state of ourfield in research
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:28:33 -0400
------ Forwarded Message From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed () reed com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:23:43 -0400 To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: <[IP]> more on a rant from your Editor on the state of ourfield in research Dave - There was a fascinating article a couple of years ago (in the NYTimes, as I recall.) In it, Bill Gates and Marc Andreesen were asked about the value of college. Each of them strongly argued that it is a waste of time. The article strongly hinted that college level learning and research are not necessary to become an acknowledged technology expert. Our richest American "technologist" (Bill Gates) essentially never went to college. Most of his employees in technology areas have bachelor's degrees (at least from my experience with visiting MS over many years). Over the past 25 years, the of my professional organizations (ACM) has had to "dumb down" (my words) its own leading journal, Communications of the ACM, because most practitioners in the field found it too arcane for their tastes. My favorite general technology magazine (Technology Review) stopped carrying articles about deep scientific subjects a few years ago (and fired its editors and columnists), to replace the content with rah-rah articles about the latest products and innovations in the marketplace. Abandoning its goal of explaining the technology of one field to bright technologists in other fields, since that was deemed boring. Instead the magazine celebrates the new and cool - sort of a Wired for the pocket protector set. TR is a fine magazine, now. But what serves the old purpose? Does anyone besides me care? In contrast, Science magazine (AAAS), which has always been my window on a lot of cutting edge science, has been working hard to bridge boundaries - it even includes pointers to competing magazines' articles, and reviews of great web sites. So what does that say about the value our field places on learning about the past? ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on a rant from your Editor on the state of ourfield in research Dave Farber (Oct 21)