IP: copyrighting DNA tunes]

[David Farber <dfarber () earthlink net>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Steinberg <synthesis () videotron ca>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 16:39:29 
To: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: [Fwd: <nettime> copyrighting DNA tunes]

Dave,

For IP if you like.
I particularly like that line
"I pity you science fiction writers out there, trying to think up
futures
as bizarre as our present."

Do you recognize it from somewhere?



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: <nettime> copyrighting DNA tunes
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:48:42 -0400
From: "Jon Ippolito" <JIppolito () guggenheim org>
Reply-To: "Jon Ippolito" <JIppolito () guggenheim org>
To: nettime-l () bbs thing net

> From the Now I've Seen Everything Dept:

"Maxygen's scientists and lawyers are proposing [to] encode the DNA
sequences as MP3s or other music files and then copyright these genetic
'tunes'....As the 'authors' of these DNA-based songs, Maxygen could, in
theory, control the rights to the compositions for 95 years or more--as
opposed to the 17 years given under current patent law."

http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,52666,00.html

As laughable as Maxygen's proposal is, it also hints that the structural
defects of copyright--which is supposed to protect the lowly from the
mighty--are independent of the particular situation of art and artists.

What's next, a Celera Genomics press conference with guest spokesman
Lars
Urlich?

I pity you science fiction writers out there, trying to think up futures
as bizarre as our present.

jon

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: majordomo () bbs thing net and "info nettime-l" in the msg
body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime () bbs thing net

For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/