Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: FCC, Faced With Telecom Crisis, Could Let a Bell Buy WorldCom


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:56:52 -0400



July 15, 2002

FCC, Faced With Telecom Crisis,
Could Let a Bell Buy WorldCom

By YOCHI J. DREAZEN
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

WASHINGTON -- Declaring the telecommunications industry in a state of
"utter crisis," the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission
suggested his agency could allow a Baby Bell to take over WorldCom
Inc., a combination once seen as unthinkable.

FCC Chairman Michael Powell said the telecommunications industry is
in a state of "utter crisis" brought about by a wave of bankruptcies,
accounting scandals, and plunging stock prices.

The last two years have been rough on telecom companies by any
measure. * At the end of 2000 there were 330 competitive
local-exchange carriers challenging Baby Bells. Today there are fewer
than 80.

A merger of a large regional phone carrier and the nation's
second-largest long-distance company would reverse the FCC's position
on such deals. It could also revive the spirit of AT&T's monopoly
before the 1984 court-ordered breakup that created the regional Baby
Bells, by allowing one company to control huge swaths of both markets.

But in his first public comments on the unfolding WorldCom scandal,
FCC Chairman Michael Powell said the industry's battered, debt-ridden
condition now leaves regulators little choice but to consider such
options, especially if the alternatives would disrupt phone and data
service to WorldCom's 20 million customers. To keep WorldCom's
operations stable, he also called for the government to continue its
billions of dollars in federal contracts with the company, rather
than pull back as some White House officials have suggested.

Mr. Powell cautioned that a Bell's bid for WorldCom would still be
far from certain to win regulatory approval. But one remedy for the
broader industry's ills, he said, could be major consolidations along
the lines the defense industry went through in the 1990s.

"There are plenty of doctrines in antitrust and competition policy
that would take into consideration the duress and state of the
market," said Mr. Powell, who in the Clinton administration was a top
official of the Justice Department's antitrust division. "If a Bell
company brought a deal to us, that would certainly be part of the
consideration."

Just five years ago, then-FCC Chairman Reed Hundt helped sink a
potential $50 billion merger between the Baby Bell SBC Communications
Inc. and AT&T Corp. -- still the leading long-distance carrier -- by
publicly labeling such a combination "unthinkable" because of its
size.

A deal between a Bell and WorldCom also could lead to further
consolidation as the other Bells scrambled to acquire AT&T and Sprint
Corp. as a way of keeping pace. Mr. Powell, however, suggested that
Bells probably would have trouble affording such acquisitions.

Damage to the telecommunications sector, the FCC chairman said,
extends far beyond ailing companies such as WorldCom, Global Crossing
Ltd. and Qwest Communications International Inc. Even relatively
stable companies such as Verizon Communications Inc. and SBC face
huge challenges now that lenders are extremely hostile to telecom
companies.

"The real problem is that there was a collapse in this sector, a
crisis in this sector, even before all of this happened," he said,
noting that WorldCom's share price had plunged to $1 before the
accounting scandal broke. "That's why this is so painful to the
telecom market -- talk about something that was down on its knees and
didn't need to be kicked in the gut."

Mr. Powell said a big concern is that other telecommunications
companies may be hiding their own accounting irregularities. He
declined to name specific companies, but said his agency is trying to
be prepared for the impact a bankruptcy filing by WorldCom or other
carriers would have on their customers.

In a wide-ranging interview in his office where an oversized
flat-screen computer monitor sits on a sprawling desk, Mr. Powell
said the government bore some responsibility for the industry's
problems, which began with the frenzy to create new companies
following the landmark 1996 Telecommunications Act. The law allowed
Bells and long-distance companies to enter each other's markets to
foster increased competition, but didn't address the prospect that
they would look to acquire each other and reduce the number of
competitors.

Mr. Powell said that he thinks the FCC may have erred in the past by
implicitly encouraging the formation of hundreds of Bell competitors
without realizing how few of them would ultimately be able to
survive. Many of those companies borrowed heavily to finance their
quick expansion but have since filed for bankruptcy or appear likely
to do so in the near future.

"We correctly believed these markets didn't need to be natural
monopolies and they could be competitive, but I think we tended to
over-exaggerate how quickly and how dramatically it could become
competitive," Mr. Powell said.

Pressure to show profits apparently led companies such as WorldCom to
cook their books when their performance failed to live up to
expectations. "It wouldn't shock me," Mr. Powell said, "if there were
more companies that couldn't resist those pressures honestly."

Mr. Powell's remarks came days after former WorldCom executives
accused of artificially inflating the company's revenues by almost $4
billion angered lawmakers at a congressional hearing by refusing to
testify. One of the executives, former WorldCom chief financial
officer Scott Sullivan, has told the company's internal investigators
that ousted chief executive officer Bernard J. Ebbers knew of his
plan to shift billions of dollars of normal expenses into capital
expenditures accounts, boosting the company's earnings, congressional
investigators said. Mr. Ebbers's attorney denies that account.

Mr. Powell said Messrs. Sullivan and Ebbers deserve to be punished
for their roles. "At the end of the day, the officers of a
corporation are responsible for the credibility and value of that
corporation," Mr. Powell said. "This was classic dime-store fraud,
and it may have spread deep into the company like a cancer."

Nevertheless, he made clear the company's long-distance and data
services operations need to be kept stable, though the General
Services Administration is reviewing WorldCom's government contracts
and the White House has said it might bar federal agencies from
signing new deals with the company.

The government "ought to be very, very careful about adding to the
circumstances that might collapse the company," he said. "This is a
significant company whose assets are critical components of the
entire network. It would be messy if they became unavailable."

WorldCom's current management, including new CEO John Sidgmore, said
Thursday that a bankruptcy filing by the company, based in Clinton,
Miss., was looking increasingly likely. Protecting WorldCom's
business and residential customers is rapidly becoming a hot
political issue. On Friday, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ernest
F. Hollings wrote Mr. Powell that his "foremost responsibility is to
protect the integrity and reliability of the nation's
telecommunications network." The South Carolina Democrat also asked
Mr. Powell to detail the agency's contingency plans.

At this point, Mr. Powell said, WorldCom's officials and lenders have
given assurances that the company would continue to fully maintain
its voice and data networks. "It's going to be a tricky situation
because there will need to be a major restructuring of the company or
its assets that doesn't lead to service outages," Mr. Powell said.
"We're watching closely, but for now both the company and the banks
believe that keeping the networks running is in everyone's best
interest."

Still, he said, "things are becoming more acute by the day."

Write to Yochi J. Dreazen at yochi.dreazen@wsj.com2

        URL for this article:
<http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB1026696580457716480.djm,00.html>

For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: