Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Karl on Salon articleon ICANN and Dyson
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 15:20:09 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: "Karl Auerbach"<karl () cavebear com> Sent: 7/27/02 2:40:00 PM To: "Dave Farber"<dave () farber net> Subject: Re: IP: Salon articleon ICANN and Dyson A couple of points: 1. The hearing on my petition to inspect ICANN's records is this coming Monday morning next at 9:30am PDT at the Los Angeles County Superior Court, 111 N. Hill Street, Department 85 (8th floor). 2. I have put many ideas before ICANN. These have never appeared on ICANN's web site - ICANN has silently refused repeated requests to post my writeups on its web site even though ICANN regularly posts similar materials from other directors and "staff". I have put several proposal before ICANN. Every one was simply buried; no discussion of these ever occurred within ICANN. When I tried to make motions on some of these I was blocked by arbitrary, one time rules against doing so. Dyson claims that I was not being reasonable. I don't agree. From my point of view it was ICANN that is suffering from a lapse of reasonablity. Here are some of matters that I proposed to ICANN (this is a partial list): - Monitoring DNS roots for performance and data integrity (so we don't lose .com again without noticing the absence. And yes, this did happen. Verisign eventually decided to do some of this on its own initiative and own money.) - IPv6 support in DNS registry registrar systems. (If you have IPv6 based DNS servers there is no mechanism in the ICANN system to register these.) - A whole slew of ways to enhance DNS security http://www.cavebear.com/rw/steps-to-protect-dns.htm (ICANN still has not responded with concrete steps to 9/11. My proposals, offered last October, were simply ignored by ICANN.) - Proposals for allowing individuals who own domain names to have their own "constituency" in ICANN alongside those for businesses, ISPs, DNS registries/registrars, and intellectual property owners. - Various reform plans - http://www.cavebear.com/rw/apfi.htm and the latter part of http://www.cavebear.com/rw/prescription-to-promote.pdf I've never had a shortage of plans to reform ICANN. But these suggestions were constantly brushed aside by ICANN as being not necessary (ICANN apparently being the best of all possible institutions) or otherwise beyond the scope of discussion. - A concise statement of ICANN's proper role: ICANN role should consist of two jobs and two jobs only: - Making sure that IP addresses are assigned and allocated on a fair and equitable basis and in conformity with demands of the the packet routing systems of the Internet. - Making sure that the ICANN/NTIA root zone is expanded on a basis that is fair and equitable to everyone, that the root zone file is properly maintained and disseminated, and that its set of root servers are operated by persons and entities that have the proper skills, resources, and obligations. [Message truncated. Tap Edit->Mark for Download to get remaining portion.] For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- IP: Karl on Salon articleon ICANN and Dyson Dave Farber (Jul 27)