IP: more on Google retaliates against comcast.net (fwd)

[David Farber <dfarber () earthlink net>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Spannaus <tim () emdicium com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:13:42 
To: farber () cis upenn edu
Subject: Re: IP: more on  Google retaliates against comcast.net (fwd)



Dave --

I am a Comcast subscriber, and while I can use the Google search engine, 
Microsoft blocks me from sending mail from the Comcast domain to WebTV 
subscribers.

This is the email I received from WebTV customer support after email to my 
parents was blocked.



> Thank you for contacting MSN TV.
>
> We understand your parents are not able to receive your emails as you have 
> a comcast.net provider.
>
> We regret the inconvemnience caused.
>
> It sounds like your e-mail may not be getting to your parents because you 
> are sending it from a domain that has been blocked by MSN TV service. MSN 
> TV blocks certain domains that are known for sending large amounts of 
> unsolicited e-mail, or Spam. That is not to say that you are sending Spam, 
> but as long as your parents choose to leave the Spam Filter on, they will 
> not be able to recieve e-mail from banned domain names.

At 02:01 PM 4/17/2002 -0500, you wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jamie McCarthy <jamie () mccarthy vg>
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:53:19
> To: farber () cis upenn edu
> Subject: Re: IP: Google retaliates against comcast.net (fwd)
>
> > it looks like search engines will never be the same again.
>
> As the news report itself notes, this behavior is not new.
>
> Any web service that provides information that requires significant
> resources -- for example, doing a query on a database that indexes
> the entire internet! -- can easily be DoS'd (denial-of-serviced) by
> one idiot with a cable modem and a perl script.
>
> Why should Google allow thousands of dollars worth of equipment to
> be tied up for hours or days, providing data to one person for free?
>
> Providers of services that don't require user login have only one
> option:  shutting off connections for a group of IP numbers,
> typically the idiot's modem pool.  This will usually catch innocent
> users too.  One can only hope there is a contact email address
> provided and a human staffer at the other end to rectify as much of
> the collateral damage as possible.
>
> Meanwhile, there are enough open HTTP proxies out there to allow the
> idiot with the perl script to bomb sites from literally thousands of
> proxies simultaneously.  Such Distributed Denial of Service attacks
> appear to come from all over the net and are almost impossible to
> stop.  My prediction is that open web proxies will be seen in a few
> years as open mail proxies are today:  enablers of resource theft.
> And they will be stomped out by the same unpleasant blacklist
> tactics as we currently see being used against spam.  The era of
> anonymous net access is in its final months, thanks to the idiots.
> --
>  Jamie McCarthy
>  jamie () mccarthy vg
>
> For archives see:
> http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/

For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/